Firm Boundary Determination in Non-Competitive Markets
In markets with low competition, such as monopolies or oligopolies, the boundaries of a firm are less disciplined by market efficiency. Instead, factors like managerial discretion, the pursuit of market power, strategic foreclosure of competitors, or the desire for control over the supply chain can become the primary determinants of a firm's scope, even if these choices lead to higher costs than market-based alternatives.
0
1
Tags
Economics
Economy
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
CORE Econ
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Related
Market Penalties for Inefficient Firm Boundaries
Efficiency Gains from Optimal Firm Boundaries
Inefficient Vertical Integration in the Auto Industry
Success of Fabless Semiconductor Companies as an Example of Efficient Outsourcing
The Decline of the Studio System in Hollywood as an Example of Market-Driven De-Integration
Firm Boundary Determination in Non-Competitive Markets
Competitive Pressures on Firm Strategy
Two companies, AutoCorp and FlexiDrive, compete in the automotive industry. AutoCorp is highly integrated, owning its own steel mills, rubber plantations, and component factories to produce nearly every part of its vehicles in-house. FlexiDrive focuses on vehicle design and final assembly, sourcing its steel, tires, and electronic components from a network of specialized, independent global suppliers. In a fiercely competitive market, which of the following statements best analyzes the likely long-term outcome based on principles of economic efficiency?
A new online service allows people to pay professional mourners to attend funerals to make the deceased's family appear more respected. According to the argument that commodifying certain goods can be morally objectionable, the primary reason to oppose this service is that it is an economically inefficient use of resources.
Strategic Shift at Innovate Inc.
In-House Development vs. Outsourcing Decision
Match each corporate strategy regarding its operational boundaries with the most likely long-term consequence in a competitive market.
In a market with very little competition, a large, highly integrated firm that produces most of its own inputs is guaranteed to be more efficient than smaller firms that outsource because it has greater control over its supply chain.
A highly profitable software development firm, known for its innovative applications, decides to expand its operations by building its own factories to manufacture the computer hardware on which its software runs. The CEO's rationale is to 'ensure quality and control the entire user experience.' From an economic perspective that views the market as the ultimate judge of business structure, what is the most significant risk of this strategy?
Evaluating Vertical Integration at 'Gourmet Grains'
A large, diversified corporation that has historically manufactured all its own components, managed its own logistics, and handled its own marketing is now consistently losing market share to smaller, specialized firms. These smaller firms focus on a single part of the value chain (e.g., only manufacturing, or only marketing) and contract with other specialized firms for other needs. From an economic efficiency standpoint, what is the most likely explanation for the large corporation's decline?
Strategic Shift at Innovate Inc.