Gilligan's Perspective on the Heinz Dilemma
From Carol Gilligan's perspective, which emphasizes relationships, a valid moral response to the Heinz dilemma would be for Heinz not to steal the medicine. The reasoning behind this choice is that if he were arrested and jailed, he would be separated from his wife. This outcome would damage their interpersonal connection and leave her to potentially die alone, which is seen as a negative moral outcome in a framework that values connectedness.
0
1
Tags
Ch.9 Lifespan Development - Psychology @ OpenStax
Psychology @ OpenStax
Introduction to Psychology @ OpenStax Course
OpenStax
OpenStax Psychology (2nd ed.) Textbook
Psychology
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Related
Gilligan's Perspective on the Heinz Dilemma
The Relationship Between Heinz's Moral Dilemma and the Preconventional Stage of Morality
The Relationship Between Heinz's Moral Dilemma and the Conventional Stage of Morality
The Relationship Between Heinz's Moral Dilemma and the Postconventional Stage of Morality
Gilligan's Perspective on the Heinz Dilemma
A man's wife is dying from a rare disease. A pharmacist has discovered a drug that can save her but is charging an exorbitant price that the man cannot afford. After exhausting all legal means to get the drug, the man considers breaking into the pharmacy to steal it. Which of the following statements represents a justification based on abstract, universal ethical principles rather than on fear of punishment or adherence to societal laws?
A man's wife is near death from a rare cancer. A local druggist has discovered a drug that could save her, but he is charging ten times the production cost. The husband, Heinz, cannot afford it. After trying to negotiate, he gets desperate and considers breaking into the store to steal the drug. Which of the following justifications for Heinz's potential actions best demonstrates the postconventional stage of moral reasoning?