Learn Before
If a psychologist designs a study that involves measuring participants' heart rates while they sit quietly and read a book, how should the researcher classify the risk level in their Institutional Review Board (IRB) application, and what level of review might this qualify for?
Question: If a psychologist designs a study that involves measuring participants' heart rates while they sit quietly and read a book, how should the researcher classify the risk level in their Institutional Review Board (IRB) application, and what level of review might this qualify for?
Sample answer: The researcher should classify the study as 'minimal risk' because sitting quietly and reading while having a heart rate measured does not exceed the risks of daily life or a routine physical evaluation. This classification would qualify the study for an expedited review by the IRB.
Key points:
- Classifies the proposed study design as having minimal risk.
- Applies the concept of routine physical evaluations or daily life risks to the heart rate measurement procedure.
- States that this risk level helps the IRB determine the necessary level of oversight.
- Identifies expedited review as the appropriate oversight level for this procedure.
Rubric: The student should classify the proposed risk as 'minimal risk' and state that it qualifies for 'expedited review', connecting the physiological measurement to the standard of routine physical evaluations or ordinary daily activities.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
Expedited Research
Justifying Minimal Risk Research
How is 'minimal risk' defined in the context of research ethics?
In order for a research study to be classified as 'minimal risk,' the study's procedures must be completely free of any potential physical or psychological harm.
Classify each of the following research procedures by matching it to the correct risk category, based on whether the potential for harm exceeds the threshold of daily life or routine evaluations.
Arrange the steps in the logical process used to analyze whether a psychological research study meets the ethical criteria for 'minimal risk'.
Imagine you are developing a research protocol to study the effects of environmental noise on reading comprehension. Which of the following study designs would you construct to ensure the procedure remains at the level of 'minimal risk'?
Under research ethics guidelines, 'minimal risk' is defined as potential harm that does not exceed the risks individuals ordinarily encounter in their daily lives or during routine physical or psychological evaluations.
Match each component or implication of the 'minimal risk' standard in psychological research with the description that best represents its role in the ethical review process.
An ethics committee is reviewing a research proposal where participants are asked to give a short speech to a small audience. To evaluate whether this study meets the standard of 'minimal risk,' the committee must judge whether the social anxiety induced by the task is no greater than the anxiety typically encountered in _____.
An IRB is evaluating a study on reading comprehension under distraction. To determine if the study qualifies for expedited review, the committee must analyze whether the potential psychological stress of the distraction task is no greater than the level of stress individuals ordinarily experience in their daily lives or during routine examinations. If the study meets this criteria, it is classified as posing _____.
Order the steps an IRB member or researcher must take to evaluate a research proposal's risk status and determine the appropriate level of institutional review board oversight.
Define the concept of 'minimal risk' in the context of psychological research and explicitly state why establishing this threshold is a necessary step for Institutional Review Boards (IRBs).
Based on the definition of minimal risk, evaluate whether the researcher's justification for requesting an expedited review is accurate. Explain your reasoning using the standard criteria for minimal risk.
If a psychologist designs a study that involves measuring participants' heart rates while they sit quietly and read a book, how should the researcher classify the risk level in their Institutional Review Board (IRB) application, and what level of review might this qualify for?