Learn Before
Imagine a researcher is evaluating a new belief about human behavior. Apply the concept of a 'method of knowing' to explain why the researcher must consider the specific approach used to form this belief.
Question: Imagine a researcher is evaluating a new belief about human behavior. Apply the concept of a 'method of knowing' to explain why the researcher must consider the specific approach used to form this belief.
Sample answer: The researcher must consider the specific method of knowing because each of the five main categories possesses its own unique strengths and weaknesses when it comes to determining whether we should trust the knowledge derived from it.
Key points:
- There are different conceptual processes to acquire knowledge.
- Each category of knowing has unique strengths.
- Each category of knowing has unique weaknesses.
- Understanding these strengths and weaknesses helps determine if the derived knowledge should be trusted.
Rubric: Full credit is awarded for stating that different methods of knowing have unique strengths and weaknesses regarding the trustworthiness of the knowledge derived from them.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
Intuition
Method of Authority
Empiricism
Rationalism
Scientific Method
How is a 'method of knowing' best defined?
In psychology research, understanding how we acquire knowledge is essential. Match each 'method of knowing' with the description that best captures its specific approach to forming beliefs or acquiring information.
A student is exploring the different ways that people form beliefs and acquire knowledge. Arrange the following research-related scenarios in order of their reliance on objective, empirical evidence, starting with the method that is the least evidence-based and ending with the one that is the most evidence-based.
The method of authority and the method of rationalism share a common limitation: both can lead to false knowledge if the initial source or premise is incorrect, as neither method inherently requires verification through direct observation.
The various approaches individuals use to acquire knowledge and form beliefs, known as 'methods of knowing,' are described as a spectrum that ranges from:
A 'method of knowing' is best described as the specific collection of facts an individual has already acquired about the world, rather than the conceptual process used to form those beliefs.
A researcher is asked to judge the scientific merit of a theory that was developed through a set of logical deductions but has never been tested in a laboratory or field setting. The researcher critiques the theory for relying on the method of _____, which is evaluated as a limited approach to knowledge because logical consistency alone cannot guarantee that a conclusion aligns with the observable, physical reality of behavior.
A student is evaluating how they form beliefs in different situations. Match each real-world application to the specific concept of knowing it represents.
An analysis of the spectrum of approaches to acquiring knowledge reveals that the five main categories range from relying on subjective sources (such as intuition) on one end to depending on _____ on the other end.
To determine whether we should trust the knowledge derived from different sources, evaluate and order the following approaches from the least objective (relying most on subjective trust) to the most objective (depending on empirical verification).
Define what a 'method of knowing' is and describe the spectrum along which the five main categories of these methods range.
Based on the case, diagnose which ends of the 'method of knowing' spectrum the student's two options fall on, and justify why recognizing this distinction is important for evaluating the information for their research paper.
Imagine a researcher is evaluating a new belief about human behavior. Apply the concept of a 'method of knowing' to explain why the researcher must consider the specific approach used to form this belief.