Imagine you are designing a study to investigate the relationship between student self-esteem and school achievement (GPAs). Apply the principles of correlational research to explain how you would measure both variables, and describe one specific action you must avoid to ensure the study remains correlational.
Question: Imagine you are designing a study to investigate the relationship between student self-esteem and school achievement (GPAs). Apply the principles of correlational research to explain how you would measure both variables, and describe one specific action you must avoid to ensure the study remains correlational.
Sample answer: To conduct a correlational study, I would measure students' self-esteem using a standardized survey and obtain their GPAs from academic records. I must avoid introducing any treatment or intervention, such as a workshop designed to raise self-esteem, as this would manipulate a variable and turn the study into an experiment.
Key points:
- Measure self-esteem and GPA without manipulating them.
- Avoid implementing any intervention or treatment program.
- Observe how the variables naturally occur to determine if they are statistically related.
Rubric: Award 1 point for describing a valid method of measuring both variables (self-esteem and GPA) without intervention. Award 1 point for identifying a specific experimental action to avoid, such as manipulating self-esteem or randomly assigning students to groups.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
When conducting a correlational study on the relationship between students' self-esteem and their school achievement, how does the researcher interact with the variables?
A study investigating the relationship between students' self-esteem and their academic achievement (such as GPAs) is classified as correlational research if the researcher measures these variables as they naturally occur without manipulating an independent variable.
A researcher is conducting a study to examine the link between student self-esteem and school achievement. To ensure the design remains correlational, match each specific research action with the component of a correlational design it represents.
A researcher is investigating the relationship between student self-esteem and academic achievement (GPA). Arrange the following steps in the correct logical sequence to reflect how this specific study is structured to identify a statistical association without using experimental manipulation.
You are tasked with designing a new study to determine if 'perceived stress' is a stronger correlate of academic success than self-esteem. Which of the following implementation plans would you generate to construct a valid correlational study for this three-variable inquiry?
A researcher seeking to prove that high self-esteem directly causes better school achievement () decides to observe both variables as they naturally occur without any intervention. A peer reviewer would evaluate this decision as scientifically inadequate because the researcher's goal requires the _____ of an independent variable.
In the classic example of correlational research examining the relationship between students' self-esteem and their GPAs, the researcher collects data on both variables as they naturally occur and does NOT manipulate any _____.
A researcher reports a statistically significant positive correlation (r = .45) between student self-esteem and GPA. The school board, applying this finding, votes to fund a self-esteem intervention program expecting it to raise students' grades. Applying what you know about correlational research, is the school board's causal reasoning directly supported by this study?
For the classic correlational study on student self-esteem and GPA, match each research element on the left to the methodological role it plays on the right.
A peer reviewer is evaluating the scientific quality of a correlational study on student self-esteem and GPA. Arrange the following reviewer actions in the most appropriate logical order to conduct a rigorous and defensible critique.
In the context of the classic example of correlational research involving self-esteem and school achievement, outline the process of how data is collected on the variables and state the key feature that distinguishes this study as correlational rather than experimental.
Based on the provided case, explain why this study is classified as correlational. Describe the nature of the variables being measured and justify why this design cannot be considered experimental.
Imagine you are designing a study to investigate the relationship between student self-esteem and school achievement (GPAs). Apply the principles of correlational research to explain how you would measure both variables, and describe one specific action you must avoid to ensure the study remains correlational.