Short Answer

Imagine you are designing a study to test the 'Adult Children of Alcoholics' myth. Operationally define the group status variable, and explain what findings would support the myth versus what findings would align with the empirical research cited in the text.

Question: Imagine you are designing a study to test the 'Adult Children of Alcoholics' myth. Operationally define the group status variable, and explain what findings would support the myth versus what findings would align with the empirical research cited in the text.

Sample answer: The group status variable can be operationally defined by categorizing participants into an experimental group (adults whose parents met diagnostic criteria for alcoholism) and a control group (adults whose parents did not). Finding that the experimental group has significantly lower self-esteem or greater intimacy difficulties would support the myth, whereas finding no significant differences between the two groups would align with the empirical research.

Key points:

  • Operationally define the group status by categorizing participants based on whether their parents had alcoholism.
  • A finding of significantly worse psychological outcomes for the alcoholic-parent group would support the myth.
  • A finding of no significant differences between the groups aligns with the actual empirical research.

Rubric: The student must provide an operational definition for the group status variable (categorizing based on parent alcoholic status) and correctly contrast the two outcomes (a significant difference supports the myth, while no significant difference aligns with empirical research).

0

1

Updated 2026-05-26

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

KPU

Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU

Related