Infringement of medical autonomy in the COVID-19 pandemic
Usually, clinicians cannot withhold or withdraw medically necessary treatment without the patient's (or surrogate's) consent, but in pandemic crises, healthcare systems supersede autonomy to maximize public health through allocation and rationing of resources.
0
1
Contributors are:
Who are from:
Tags
SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19)
Biomedical Sciences
Related
Beneficence/non-maleficence and pandemic
Justice and pandemic
Fair innings and pandemic
Instrumental value and pandemic
Can the Health-Care System Meet the Challenge of Pandemic Flu? Planning, Ethical, and Workforce Considerations
Infringement of medical autonomy in the COVID-19 pandemic
Types of Autonomy
Infringement of medical autonomy in the COVID-19 pandemic
Informed Consent
In the context of research ethics, what does the principle of autonomy primarily refer to?
A professor mandates that all students in their introductory psychology class must participate in an ongoing research study to receive a passing grade, with no alternative assignments provided. This policy aligns with the ethical principle of autonomy.
Arrange the following steps in the correct chronological order to demonstrate how the ethical principle of autonomy is typically upheld throughout a psychology research study.
Analyze the following research scenarios and match each ethical concept to the specific situation that best illustrates how it impacts a participant's autonomy.
You are designing a psychological study that requires participants to share personal journal entries over several months. To construct a framework that maximizes the ethical principle of autonomy, which combination of design elements should you build into your study's operational protocol?
In the context of psychological research ethics, match each term related to the principle of autonomy with the description that best defines its role.
The ethical principle of autonomy implies that once a participant has provided informed consent at the start of a study, they have committed to the research and no longer have the independent right to withdraw.
An ethics committee evaluates a study protocol where participants are offered $1,000 for a minor task but are told they cannot withdraw once the study begins. The committee critiques this design, judging that the high incentive and the inability to leave constitute a form of coercion. This evaluation concludes that the study fails to uphold the ethical principle of _____, which requires that individuals have the right to make their own independent choices free from pressure.
A researcher studying financial decision-making recruits participants from a homeless shelter, offering a $300 payment for a two-hour lab session. The IRB reviewer flags this design, noting that while no explicit threats are made, the magnitude of the payment relative to participants' economic circumstances may eliminate their genuine ability to decline enrollment. By analyzing this situation against the principle of autonomy, the reviewer is specifically concerned that participation is no longe
An IRB panel is judging whether a proposed study's consent process adequately protects participant autonomy. Place the following evaluation criteria in order from most foundational (must be confirmed first) to most integrative (capstone judgment), reflecting a logically sound ethical review.
Define the concept of autonomy within the context of research ethics, and identify both the moral value it honors and the primary research procedure used to uphold it.
Explain how Dr. Julian's recruitment protocol compromises the principle of autonomy, and describe which specific ethical prerequisite of research participation is violated as a result of this design.
You are designing a psychological survey on personal habits. How would you apply the ethical principle of autonomy in your study's design to ensure participants' human dignity is respected before and during data collection?