Journalists interpreting preprints effect on scicomm according to Jessica Rivera MS (reply to nataliexdean)

Heather Lander PhD responds to nataliexdeans tweet reaffirming her message

Tim Plante MD MHS responds to nataliexdean with his solution to help first time writers

Analysis of Natalie E. Dean tweet

Hypothesis 1 of Natalie E. Dean tweet

Hypothesis 2 of Natalie E. Dean tweet

Hypothesis 3 of Natalie E. Dean tweet

Hypothesis 4 of Natalie E. Dean tweet

Hypothesis 5 (solution) of Natalie E. Dean tweet

Journalists interpreting preprints effect on scicomm according to Jessica Rivera MS (reply to nataliexdean)

The user RexxS on Wikipedia talks about the rapid increase in demand and supply of research articles is a subject of insufficient sourcing

In this Wikipedia talk, researchers talk about the COVID case estimates differ by country due to different testing methods which might be a cause for false alarms.

Wikipedia has labeled “face masks not having demonstrated effectiveness” as misinformation. The user here argues that many types of face masks have demonstrated ineffectiveness, so this information cannot be labelled entirely as misinformation. She further adds that the article also lacks reliability.

Dr.Krutika Kuppalli tweets about the spread of misinformation because of influential people who are not credible in the field of epidemiology

Ellie Murray tweets about how to communicate with other scientists from other disciplines to collaborate

Wikipedia: Inconsistent numbers due to the lack of knowledge over documentation