Mechanism: Competition Weakens a Responder's Power of Refusal
In an ultimatum game with multiple responders, an individual's ability to punish a proposer for an unfair offer is significantly diminished. While rejecting a low offer still results in a zero payoff for the individual, the proposer is not guaranteed to be penalized, as they may still receive a positive payoff if another responder accepts the same offer. This makes rejection a less effective tool for enforcing fairness norms. The uncertainty is heightened because a responder who values fairness cannot be sure that a competitor, who might have different preferences or needs, will also reject the low offer.
0
1
Tags
Library Science
Economics
Economy
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
CORE Econ
Ch.4 Strategic interactions and social dilemmas - The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Ch.5 The rules of the game: Who gets what and why - The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Related
Mechanism: Competition Weakens a Responder's Power of Refusal
Responder Competition Increases Proposer's Bargaining Power
Behavioral Shift in a Competitive Bargaining Scenario
In a standard bargaining scenario, a 'Proposer' offers a 'Responder' a portion of a sum of money, say $10. If the Responder accepts, they split the money as proposed. If the Responder rejects, both get nothing. Now, consider a modified scenario where the Proposer makes the same offer to two Responders at the same time. The first Responder to accept the deal gets the offered portion, and the game ends. If both reject, everyone gets nothing. How does the introduction of a second, competing Responder most likely change the behavior of an individual Responder when faced with a low offer (e.g., $1 out of the $10)?
The Influence of Competition on Bargaining Behavior
In a bargaining scenario where two individuals must compete to accept a single offer from a third party, an individual's increased willingness to accept a low offer stems from a greater sense of fairness and empathy towards the offer-maker.
Comparing Responder Behavior in Bargaining Scenarios
Match each bargaining scenario with the most likely primary motivation influencing the 'Responder's' decision-making process.
In a bargaining situation where a single offer is made to two competing individuals, a person is more likely to accept a low offer primarily because the presence of a competitor significantly ________ their ability to effectively punish the offer-maker for an unfair proposal.
A 'Proposer' offers to give one dollar from a total of ten dollars to another person, the 'Responder'. The Responder's decision determines the outcome. Consider three variations of this scenario. Arrange them in order, from the one where the Responder is least likely to accept the one-dollar offer to the one where they are most likely to accept it.
An economist runs two experiments. In Experiment 1, a 'Proposer' offers a split of $20 to a single 'Responder'. In Experiment 2, a Proposer makes the same offer to two Responders simultaneously, and the first to accept wins the money. The economist observes that Responders in Experiment 2 accept significantly lower offers than Responders in Experiment 1. A student reviewing the results concludes: 'This proves that the people randomly assigned to Experiment 2 were simply more focused on personal profit and less concerned about fairness than the people in Experiment 1.' Which statement below provides the most accurate critique of the student's conclusion?
Critiquing Fairness with Bargaining Game Evidence
Learn After
Why Fairness-Minded Responders Accept Low Offers in Competitive Games
Responder Competition Increases Proposer's Bargaining Power
Evaluating a Strategy in a Competitive Bargaining Game
In a standard one-on-one bargaining game, a Proposer offers a split of a sum of money to a Responder. If the Responder rejects the offer, both parties get nothing, giving the Responder the power to punish what they perceive as an unfair offer. How does this power dynamic fundamentally change for an individual Responder if the Proposer makes the same offer simultaneously to two competing Responders, where the first one to accept the offer finalizes the deal?
The Impact of Competition on Bargaining Power
Consider a situation where one person proposes how to split a sum of money with two other people. The offer is made to both potential recipients simultaneously, and the first to accept gets the deal, ending the game. In this scenario, an individual recipient's decision to reject a low offer is an equally effective method of punishing the proposer as it would be if they were the sole recipient of the offer.
A Proposer has $10 to split and makes a simultaneous take-it-or-leave-it offer to two Responders, A and B. The offer is: the first Responder to accept gets $2, and the Proposer keeps $8. If both Responders reject the offer, everyone gets $0. Responder A personally feels that any offer below $4 is unfair. Which of the following statements best analyzes Responder A's strategic dilemma in this situation?
Strategic Comparison of Bargaining Scenarios
A Proposer is splitting a sum of money. Consider two distinct scenarios. In Scenario 1, the Proposer makes a take-it-or-leave-it offer to a single Responder. In Scenario 2, the Proposer makes the same offer simultaneously to two competing Responders, with the deal going to the first who accepts. Match each scenario to the correct description of the Responder's power dynamic.
The Ineffectiveness of Individual Punishment in Competitive Bargaining
The Freelance Designer's Dilemma
Imagine a bargaining scenario where a Proposer offers to give $1 from a total of $10 to the first of two Responders (Responder X and Responder Y) who accepts the offer. If both reject, everyone gets $0. Responder X believes any offer less than $4 is unfair and, in a one-on-one situation, would reject this $1 offer to punish the Proposer.
In this competitive scenario with Responder Y present, why might Responder X rationally choose to accept the $1 offer, despite viewing it as unfair?
Consider a situation where one person proposes how to split a sum of money with two other people. The offer is made to both potential recipients simultaneously, and the first to accept gets the deal, ending the game. In this scenario, an individual recipient's decision to reject a low offer is an equally effective method of punishing the proposer as it would be if they were the sole recipient of the offer.