Misinformation and Morality Experiment 3: Deliberative vs Intuitive Thinking
Study Design: This experiment tested if telling people to think deliberately about their decisions before logging their answers had an affect on moral judgements. The procedure was identical to the other two experiments, except the subjects were split into two groups: a deliberative-thinking group and a control.
Results: Participants expressed significantly less condemnation of previously seen headlines than new headlines and significantly more condemnation when induced to think deliberately as opposed to intuitively.
0
1
Tags
Psychology
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Related
Misinformation and Morality Experiment 2: Single Exposure to Headlines
Misinformation and Morality Experiment 3: Deliberative vs Intuitive Thinking
Misinformation and Morality Experiment 4: Testing the Role of Accuracy Judgements
Misinformation and Morality Experiment 1: Prior Exposure and Ethicality Ratings