Relation
Procedure of "Flagging fake news on social media: An experimental study of media consumers' identification of fake news"
- 717 participants were recruited to participate in a preregistered experiment on Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk)
- Participants were randomly assigned into three groups: a control group in which participants were only presented with news items, a treatment group where participants were presented with news as well as flags created by fact-checkers (Treatment 1), and a treatment group where participants were presented with news as well as crowdsourced flags (Treatment 2)
- Participants in each group all read 30 news items containing a headline, an image, and a lead that had been selected from the archive of Snopes.com
- 1/3 of the stories were either nonpolitical or politically neutral, while the rest could be split evenly to be ideologically consistent between Democrats and Republicans
- For each news item, participants were asked to answer "In your opinion, is this a genuine news story?" within a 60 second time limit; they could answer with "yes," "no," or "not sure"

0
1
Updated 2021-08-06
Tags
Psychology
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Related
Procedure of "Flagging fake news on social media: An experimental study of media consumers' identification of fake news"
Participant Demographics in "Flagging fake news on social media: An experimental study of media consumers' identification of fake news"
Results of "Flagging fake news on social media: An experimental study of media consumers' identification of fake news"
Limitations of "Flagging fake news on social media: An experimental study of media consumers' identification of fake news"