Relation
Results of "Flagging fake news on social media: An experimental study of media consumers' identification of fake news"
- Participants in both of the treatment groups were able to identify real and fake news items at a higher average rate than participants in the control group for the news items with accurate flags
- Treatment group 1, who saw flags marked by a fact-checker, performed slightly better than participants in treatment group 2, who saw flags marked by a crowdsourcer; however, they did not perform at a statistically significant level
- When participants evaluated news items with inaccurate flags, participants in the treatment groups performed worse than participants in the control group
- Participants in both treatment groups chose the "not sure" option less frequently than their control group counterparts, regardless of the accuracy of the flags
- The probability of feeling unsure about news items was similar in participants in treatment groups 1 and 2
- The age of participants had a small but significant negative effect on "correct identification," as younger individuals performed better in the study

0
1
Updated 2021-08-06
Tags
Psychology
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Related
Procedure of "Flagging fake news on social media: An experimental study of media consumers' identification of fake news"
Participant Demographics in "Flagging fake news on social media: An experimental study of media consumers' identification of fake news"
Results of "Flagging fake news on social media: An experimental study of media consumers' identification of fake news"
Limitations of "Flagging fake news on social media: An experimental study of media consumers' identification of fake news"