Repetitions and contradictions topic sprint findings
Repetitive, false and contradictory content is being generated, which is difficult to manage and wastes time and energy.
0
1
Tags
CSCW (Computer-supported cooperative work)
Computing Sciences
Related
Difficult to efficiently inform the research community about inappropriate results/findings
Repetition and contradiction in collaborative research
Cognitive overload and determining the novelty of a new study
Published papers are static and don't get updated dynamically
Difficulties of multidisciplinary research collaboration
The increased role of preprint servers in COVID-19 research
Time-consuming to self-judge many rapidly released papers
Marketing and subscription fees of journals
Personal ambitions and carrier incentives
Flaws in the published journal papers
Difficulty Informing the Public
Challenges with current research tools
References for Barriers to COVID-19 Research
Repetitions and contradictions topic sprint findings
Finding a Consensus (problems in interdisciplinary work) topic sprint findings
Scientists are drowning in COVID-19 papers (cognitive overload) topic sprint findings
Input getting lost (difficulty of communicating with the scientific community) topic sprint findings
tweets about literature or literature (Science COVID Info)
communicating with public and politicians (Science COVID Info)
tools and methods that are helping (Science COVID Info)
Learn After
Dr. Emma Hodcroft tweets that when a scientist points out that a paper doesn't have enough evidence, they are not saying it is wrong
Matt Le Tissier tweets about the contradictions in inscientist point of views on COVID
C. Michael Gibson tweets about surgisphere (a health analytics company) lying about collaborating with NHS Scotland
Maximilian Konig tweets about how the HXCL incident is affecting lives
Andy Slavitt tweets about confusion over scientists advice
Neil Ferguson warns early on (3/27) that while there is debate, we should listen to the data
Caitlin Rivers shares "the actual WHO report" since it is often misconstrued by all the different headlines
Chris von Csefalvay tweets in a thread that harmful attitudes towards epidemiologists and the factions within epidemiology as a field distracts researchers from achieving insights into COVID. Strikes interesting debate with other epidemiologists
James Todaros tweet about not finding a consensus on the IFR and current WHO estimates
Roberto Rocha has a twitter thread on the conversation between scientists on finding a consensus about covid-19
Research Knowledge Sharing During a Pandemic: A Call to Action