The study indicated that:

• for 2016 students, the intervention led to a 6.8% increase of students using spacing while there was a decreased amount of students using spacing in control groups
• for 2017 students, the intervention led to a 1.8% increase of students using spacing while there were less students who used spacing in control groups
• 2016 showed the intervention had an 8.3% increase of students using self-testing compared to control group students having a sharp decrease of self-testing while 2017 had no noticeable effect of the intervention in encouraging students to self-test while there was a decrease in control group students who used self-testing -the intervention did encourage URM students to use self-testing, if more so for 2016 than 2017 students, though they still used this strategy less than non-URM students
• control group URM students reported a drop in self-testing like non-URM students