"Too often social scientists skip the step of defining the estimand. Instead, they leap straight to describing the data they analyze and the statistical procedures they apply." 

Lundberg, Johnson, and Stewart (2021) call this "hypotheses about regression coefficients," which "defines the research goal inside a particular statistical model."

"If your research goal is a coefficient of a particular \[statistical\] model,
- It becomes impossible for the reader to know whether those procedures were appropriate.
- The methodological approach becomes tautological: ... It becomes impossible ... to reason about other approaches to achieve the goal. ... It cuts off productive consideration of a broader class of models that could accomplish the same goal.
- A goal defined entirely within a model bears a connection to theory that is questionable at best."

What happens to Causal Inference Without a statement of the Estimand

"Adding precise estimands to research practice:
- **Expands the space of theoretical questions**: stating the research goal outside the model frees us to ask more interesting theoretical questions;
the scope of theory is no longer bound to the space of questions involving the best linear approximation to the conditional association between two variables with all else held constant (i.e., a regression coefficient)."
- "Allows readers to evaluate claims, and enables the community to build on research findings." It "clarifies how evidence can speak to those questions."
- "**Unlocks alternative estimation procedures** that could answer the research question under more credible assumptions."
- "Helps researchers **make principled choices.**

Advantages of Using the Three Critical Choices in Causal Inference

1- "Set a **theoretical estimand**, clearly connecting this quantity to theory"

2- "Link to an **empirical estimand**, which is informative about the theoretical estimand under some identification assumptions"

3- Use "an **estimation strategy** to learn the empirical estimand (e.g., a regression model) ... from data."

University of Michigan - Ann Arbor

Causal inference refers to making conclusions about finding the reasonings behind the relationship of two or more variables. After coming to some conclusions about statistical data, we ask why such relationships exist between variables.

Causal Inference

Theoretical estimand "sets the targets of inference" and defines the estimand "outside of any statistical model ... like an average causal effect or a population mean..., clearly connecting this quantity to theory" through argument.

"The unit-specific quantity and target population combine to define the theoretical estimand: the thing we would like to know if we had data for the full
population in all factual or counterfactual worlds of interest. A paper may have multiple theoretical estimands."

Theoretical Estimand

"Each theoretical estimand is linked to an empirical estimand involving only observable quantities (e.g., a difference in means in a population) by assumptions about the relationship between the data we observe and the data we do not. These identification assumptions can be conveyed in a Directed
Acyclic Graph (DAG. i.e., a causal diagram)."

Empirical Estimand

Lundberg, I., Johnson, R., & Stewart, B. M. (2021). What is your estimand? Defining the target quantity connects statistical evidence to theory. American Sociological Review, 86(3), 532-565.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/00031224211004187?casa_token=kd-8FImHZ90AAAAA:jzdKy6ZOAbd6PmxW2sXQG3CwYeSScDGeNKRJkPI0yGRzTBr2j7dUw384Bgg3Fihk9TiVLnOOUL81L4E

What Is Your Estimand? Defining the Target Quantity Connects Statistical Evidence to Theory

A machine passes this test if a human could perceive their interactions with the machine as human, indicating that the machine has successfully emulated human reasoning. 

Turing Test

- Causal Inference Books
- Causal Inference Papers

Causal Inference References

The calculus of causation is formed of:
1. Causal diagrams (the language of knowledge)
2. Causal symbolic language (the language of queries)

The calculus of causation

Organisms, as well as ML, can be divided into 3 levels of causation corresponding to three cognitive abilities: seeing, doing, and imagining.
1. Association
2. Intervention
3. Counterfactuals


Ladder of Causation 

Bayes Theorem is about predicting the probability of an event A occurring given an event B has already occurred. We can use the inverse probability of this statment and the probability of each event to find this value. 
P(A) is called prior probability, P(B|A) is Likelihood, P(B) is evidence, and P(A|B) is posterior probability.


Bayes Theorem Overview

Most of the statistical methods are entirely objective, which means reasoning exclusively from data and experiments. But causal analysis and Bayesian analysis are different in that they involves some subjectivity.

Causal analysis requires some subjective commitments based on one's knowledge in the field before the causal digram is drawn and data is explored.

Similarly, Bayesian analysis combines objective evidence with the prior subjective belief.

From objectivity to subjectivity

Both Induction and Deduction are necessary within casual inference because they are two ways of approaching a problem and often go hand in hand. Induction goes from evidence -> hypothesis while deduction works in the forward direction; cause (hypothesis) -> effect (theory, conclusion). Artificial Intelligence has started automating Induction and Deduction, an example is Bayesian networks. 

Stages of Casual Inference: Induction and Deduction

Logical reasoning is the process of using a rational, systematic series of steps based on sound certain mathematical procedures and statements to arrive at a conclusion. 

There are three types of the reasoning:
- Abductive Reasoning 
- Deductive Reasoning 
- Inductive Reasoning

Reasoning

Hill's Criteria is a collection of nine informal guidelines ("viewpoints" as supposed to requirements) used to determine whether a causal relationship exists within an observed association.  Initially, five out of the nine viewpoints were proposed by the surgeon general's advisory committee, to which Bradford Hill later added four more.  Hill's Criteria is not meant to be the necessary conditions to support or refute a cause-and-effect hypothesis.  The debate over the causality between cigarette and lung cancer prompted the criteria, which were used for the proponent of the causal relationship to justify their claim that cigarette smoking is indeed causally related to lung cancer.  

Hill's Criteria

1. necessary causation (but-for causation)
2. sufficient causation
3. necessary-and-sufficient causation

Three different kinds of causation

1. The Law of Counterfactuals
2. The Law of Conditional Independence

The Two Fundamental Laws of Causal Inference

A Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) or a Controlled Experiment is a method to eliminate unmeasurable confounders effect on causal inference by implementing an intervention on a randomly selected group of individuals (treatment/intervened group) while keeping other individuals unchanged (controlled group, placebo, not-intervened group) to observe the changes in outcomes due to the intervention effect. The RCTs are intended to "disarm" confounders (confounding variables).

Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) = Controlled Experiment

List of techniques that help solve intractable inference problems in machine learning that usually arise from interactions between latent variables in a structured graphical model.

-Expectation Maximization

-MAP Inference and Sparse Coding

-Variational Inference and Learning

-Learned Approximate Inference



Approximate Inference 

"The estimand is the target quantity—the purpose of the statistical analysis ... the thing we are estimating" " that connects statistical evidence to theory."

It refers "to both the theoretical and the empirical estimands."

Estimand

Three Critical Choices in Causal Inference

- Correlation does not imply causation.
- Causation does not imply correlation either.

Correlation vs. Causation

Establishing causality in economics is a significant challenge for two main reasons. First, unlike in many natural sciences, it is often impossible to conduct controlled experiments to isolate a single variable. The economy is a dynamic system where numerous factors change simultaneously, creating confounding variables that can lead to misleading correlations. Second, the economy's fundamental complexity, arising from the interactions of millions of people, makes it impossible to measure and understand every variable. This inherent complexity means economists must be skeptical of simple claims that one complex phenomenon, like capitalism, is the direct cause of another, such as a rise in living standards. To address these challenges, economists use methods like natural experiments and advanced statistical techniques to infer causal relationships from observational data.

The Challenge of Establishing Causality in Economics

- Unit-specific quantity
- Target population

"The goal is often a quantity involving two components: a unit-specific quantity subscripted by i aggregated over a target population of units."

Components of Theoretical Estimand

1- "The former may involve unobservable quantities such as counterfactuals, whereas the latter involves only observable data."

2- "The choice of theoretical estimands requires substantive argument about the theory and goals; the choice of empirical estimands requires conceptual argument about unobserved data."

Learn Before

Related

Learn After