Multiple Choice

Two economic historians are debating the primary drivers of rapid industrial expansion in the 18th century.

Historian 1 argues: 'The crucial factor was the large, guaranteed overseas markets for finished goods. Without the ability to sell the vast output at a good price, there would have been no profit motive to invest in new, expensive production technologies.'

Historian 2 argues: 'The profit motive came from the supply side. The availability of cheap raw materials from abroad was what allowed manufacturers to lower their costs, increase output, and thus justify investment in new machinery.'

Which historian's argument provides a more direct explanation for the investment incentive that fueled industrial growth?

0

1

Updated 2025-08-25

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

History

Humanities

Economics

Social Science

Empirical Science

Science

Economy

CORE Econ

Ch.2 User-centered design process - User Experience Design - Winter 23 @ UI Design in UI @ University of Michigan - Ann Arbor

UI Design in UI @ University of Michigan - Ann Arbor

User Experience Design - Winter 23 @ UI Design in UI @ University of Michigan - Ann Arbor

UI @ University of Michigan - Ann Arbor

User Experience Design @ UI Design in UI @ University of Michigan - Ann Arbor

University of Michigan - Ann Arbor

Introduction to Microeconomics Course

The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ

Ch.2 Technology and incentives - The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ

Evaluation in Bloom's Taxonomy

Cognitive Psychology

Psychology

Related