Two firms, 'Kites Co.' and 'Waves Inc.', are the sole producers in the market for a specialized type of surfing equipment. Both have a large number of customers who are very loyal to their respective brands. The firms must decide simultaneously whether to set a 'High Price' or a 'Low Price'. The payoff matrix below shows the daily profits for each firm based on their pricing decisions, with Kites Co.'s profit listed first in each cell.
| | Waves Inc.: High Price | Waves Inc.: Low Price | | :---
0
1
Tags
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Economy
CORE Econ
Economics
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Ch.7 The firm and its customers - The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Evaluation in Bloom's Taxonomy
Cognitive Psychology
Psychology
Related
Product Differentiation as a Source of Competitive Advantage and Market Power
Strategic Pricing with Brand Loyalty
Two firms, Firm A and Firm B, are the only competitors in a market. They must simultaneously decide whether to set a 'High Price' or a 'Low Price'. The table below shows the resulting profits for each firm based on their decisions, with Firm A's profit listed first in each pair.
Firm B: High Price Firm B: Low Price Firm A: High Price ($100, $90) ($70, $85) Firm A: Low Price ($80, $60) ($50, $55) Analyze the strategic situation presented
Two firms, 'Kites Co.' and 'Waves Inc.', are the sole producers in the market for a specialized type of surfing equipment. Both have a large number of customers who are very loyal to their respective brands. The firms must decide simultaneously whether to set a 'High Price' or a 'Low Price'. The payoff matrix below shows the daily profits for each firm based on their pricing decisions, with Kites Co.'s profit listed first in each cell.
| | Waves Inc.: High Price | Waves Inc.: Low Price | | :---
Explaining Dominant Strategy with Brand Loyalty
Evaluating a Pricing Strategy in a High-Loyalty Market
Consider a market with two competing firms, each with a substantial number of customers who are strongly loyal to their respective brands. In this scenario, if one firm unilaterally decides to lower its price while the other maintains a high price, the firm that lowered its price is guaranteed to capture a significant market share from its competitor and increase its overall profit.
Two firms, 'AquaRush' and 'GaleForce,' operate in a market characterized by a large number of customers with strong brand loyalty. They must simultaneously choose between a 'High Price' and a 'Low Price'. The payoff matrix below shows their potential profits (in thousands of dollars), with AquaRush's profit listed first.
GaleForce: High Price GaleForce: Low Price AquaRush: High Price (120, 120) (95, 110) AquaRush: Low Price (110, 95) (70, 7 Two companies, 'Peak Performance' and 'Summit Gear,' compete by setting prices. Initially, brand loyalty in the market is very low, leading to the profit outcomes (in thousands) shown in the payoff matrix below. In this initial state, both firms have a dominant strategy to set a 'Low Price'.
Initial Payoffs (Low Loyalty)
Summit Gear: High Price Summit Gear: Low Price Peak Performance: High Price (50, 50) (20, 60) Peak Performance: Low Price Two firms, Firm A and Firm B, must simultaneously decide on a pricing strategy. Below are three payoff matrices, each representing a different competitive environment. Firm A's profits are listed first in each cell. Match each payoff matrix to the strategic outcome that it represents.
Pricing Strategy for Rival Surf Shops