Learn Before
Beneficiaries of Psychological Research
When evaluating the benefits of a study, researchers must consider positive outcomes for the research participants, the broader scientific community, and society at large. For student researchers, an additional recognized benefit is the educational value and practical knowledge gained about conducting scientific research, which contributes to their future academic and career success.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
Debriefing
Unjustifiable Research Harm
APA Ethics Code
Humane Care and Use of Animals in Research
Beneficiaries of Psychological Research
Unethical Research Motivations
Risks and Benefits to Research Participants
Risks and Benefits to Science and Society
Ethical Implications of the Milgram Experiment
Why can the ethical evaluation of weighing a study's risks against its benefits be particularly challenging for psychological researchers?
A psychological study can be considered ethically acceptable even when the research participants themselves bear most of the risks, as long as the potential benefits to the broader scientific community or society are judged to sufficiently outweigh those risks.
A researcher proposes a study to test if mild electric shocks can improve concentration in students with ADHD. To evaluate the ethics of this study, match each study element to its corresponding category in a risk-benefit analysis.
A researcher is evaluating the ethicality of a study on how social isolation affects mental health. Arrange the following steps in the logical order required to effectively weigh the potential risks of the study against its potential benefits.
A researcher is developing a study to investigate the impact of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance in emergency room doctors. The study requires participants to stay awake for hours while performing simulated surgical tasks. A review committee is concerned that the high risk of physical exhaustion outweighs the scientific benefits. Which of the following newly proposed research frameworks best synthesizes a solution to achieve an ethical balance?
In the process of weighing risks against benefits, different groups are affected in different ways. Match each entity involved in psychological research to the role it typically plays in this ethical evaluation.
Because the potential risks to individual participants and the potential benefits to the scientific community are not measured in the same units, the process of deciding if a study is ethically justified requires an inherently subjective ethical _____.
In psychological research ethics, the foundational principle states that a study is considered ethical only when its potential _____ outweigh its potential risks.
Learn After
When evaluating the positive outcomes of a study, researchers consider the benefits to participants, the scientific community, and society at large. For student researchers specifically, what is an additional recognized benefit of conducting scientific research?
A psychology student argues that her proposed survey study is justified because it will give her hands-on experience with questionnaire design and data analysis, even though the study is unlikely to produce new scientific knowledge or directly help the people who complete the survey. Based on how researchers evaluate the positive outcomes of a study, this student has provided a complete justification for the study's benefits.
A university ethics board is evaluating the potential benefits of several new research proposals. Match each specific outcome of a study to the primary group that benefits from that outcome.
Researchers evaluate the positive outcomes of psychological studies across several distinct layers of impact. Arrange the following scenarios in order of their beneficiary scope, starting with the most localized outcome (individual educational growth) and ending with the broadest outcome (impact on the general public).
When evaluating the potential benefits of a psychological study, which group is recognized as a primary beneficiary alongside the research participants and the broader scientific community?
Psychological research is expected to produce positive outcomes for various groups. Match each category of beneficiary to the primary nature of the benefit they receive from a study.
A reviewer evaluates a student's thesis proposal as having a 'poor benefit-risk ratio' because it is a replication study that is unlikely to produce novel results for the scientific community. To successfully defend the project's ethical justification, the student should argue that the reviewer has failed to account for the _____, which is a recognized benefit for students learning the scientific method.
A student researcher proposes a study examining how ambient noise affects short-term memory recall. In her ethics proposal, she lists three potential benefits: participants will receive a summary of their test scores, the results will contribute to the cognitive psychology literature, and she will gain hands-on experience designing and running a controlled experiment. Applying the framework for evaluating research benefits, her inclusion of the third item as a recognized benefit in the ethics proposal is appropriate.
An ethics committee reviews three proposed benefits listed by a graduate student conducting a study on procrastination: (1) participants will receive personalized time-management tips, (2) the findings will contribute to the self-regulation literature, and (3) the student will develop skills in survey design and statistical analysis. The committee identifies benefit (3) as the _____ benefit that is uniquely recognized for student researchers, distinct from the benefits accruing to participants or the scientific community.
A student researcher is completing the benefits section of an ethics proposal for a study on test anxiety. Evaluate and arrange the following steps in the most defensible order for systematically accounting for all recognized categories of beneficiaries before weighing benefits against risks.
Identify and describe the three general groups of beneficiaries that researchers must consider when evaluating the positive outcomes of a study. In addition, state the unique educational benefit recognized specifically for student researchers.
Analyze Liam's benefits section. Explain the three general categories of beneficiaries Liam has overlooked or failed to fully describe according to ethical guidelines. How should Liam explain the benefit to himself as a student researcher?
An undergraduate student is writing an IRB proposal for a study testing a new stress-reduction exercise. The IRB asks the student to justify the study's benefits. Apply the recognized categories of research beneficiaries to explain how this study could benefit (1) the broader scientific community and (2) the student researcher specifically.