Bruno's Coercion Model and the Encomienda System
A parallel is drawn between Bruno's coercive model, where he extracts maximum surplus while leaving Angela at a subsistence level, and the historical encomienda system. This institution, implemented by Spanish colonizers in Latin America, entrusted an indigenous community and their land to a colonist known as an encomendero. The encomendero was entitled to extract any harvest above the community's subsistence level, ensuring they would just barely survive.
0
1
Tags
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Economy
Economics
CORE Econ
The Economy 1.0 @ CORE Econ
Ch.5 Property and Power: Mutual Gains and Conflict - The Economy 1.0 @ CORE Econ
Ch.1 The Capitalist Revolution - The Economy 1.0 @ CORE Econ
Ch.5 The rules of the game: Who gets what and why - The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Related
Determining Bruno's Profit-Maximizing Allocation under Coercion
Bruno's Coercion Model and the Encomienda System
In a scenario where a landowner has absolute power over a worker, the landowner's goal is to maximize their own share of the harvest. The only limit on the landowner is the need to provide the worker with just enough food to ensure their biological survival and ability to work in the future. Suppose a new, more calorie-dense crop is introduced, which means the worker requires a smaller physical quantity of the harvest to meet their survival needs. How does this technological change affect the maximum share of the harvest the landowner can claim?
The Limits of Coercion in Resource Allocation
Limits on Power in a Company Town
Consider a historical economic scenario where a powerful landowner has complete coercive control over a landless farmer, whose only source of sustenance is the portion of the harvest the landowner allocates to them. If the landowner's sole objective is to maximize their own share of the harvest, it is always rational for the landowner to provide the farmer with the absolute minimum quantity of food required for their biological survival, regardless of the total amount the farmer produces.
Productivity, Power, and Survival
In an economic model where a landowner has complete coercive power over a worker, the landowner's primary goal is to maximize the amount of grain they keep. The worker's only source of food is the grain allocated to them by the landowner. If the landowner chooses an allocation that provides the worker with less than the amount needed for biological survival, what is the most likely long-term consequence for the landowner's own outcome?
In an economic model where a powerful landowner controls a worker through coercion, various boundaries and outcomes define the possible allocations of work and harvest. Match each key concept from the model to its correct description.
Calculating the Limit of Coercive Power
In an economic model of a coercive interaction between a landowner and a landless farmer, a graph depicts all possible allocations. The vertical axis measures the farmer's grain consumption, and the horizontal axis measures the farmer's hours of free time. A horizontal line on this graph, labeled the 'biological survival constraint', intersects the vertical axis at a positive value. What does this line represent in the context of the landowner's power?
Evaluating Long-Term Strategies for a Monopolistic Employer