Learn Before
The Feasible Frontier and Allocations under Coercion (Figure 5.9)
Figure 5.9 illustrates the feasible frontier for production in a scenario where Angela can be forced to work. The graph's horizontal axis represents Angela's free time (0-24 hours), and the vertical axis shows the bushels of grain produced (0-70). The frontier itself is a downward-sloping, concave curve connecting the points (0, 64) and (24, 0). Any point on or inside this frontier is a possible allocation, specifying the division of outcomes: how much free time and grain Angela receives, and how much grain Bruno receives. Bruno has the power to decide on the allocation, as he controls Angela's work and owns all the grain she produces.
0
1
Tags
Library Science
Economics
Economy
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
CORE Econ
Ch.5 The rules of the game: Who gets what and why - The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Related
The Atlantic Slave Trade
Walk Free
Modern Forced Labor
Resistance by Forced Laborers
Feasible Frontier in Case 1 vs. Baseline Case
The Colonial Mita System of Forced Labor
Historical Prevalence of Forced Labor
The Feasible Frontier and Allocations under Coercion (Figure 5.9)
In an economic model, a landowner has complete control over a worker. The landowner dictates the worker's hours, takes the entire output, and provides the worker with only a subsistence-level share of the harvest. The worker complies because the landowner has the credible ability and willingness to inflict severe harm if they refuse. What is the fundamental reason the landowner is able to enforce this extremely unequal distribution of the output?
Constraints in a Coercive Labor Model
Analyzing Power Dynamics in a Labor Scenario
In an economic model, a powerful landowner can force a landless worker to work by making a credible threat of harm. The landowner decides how many hours the worker must labor and takes the entire harvest, but must provide the worker with some of it to live. The worker cannot leave and has no legal recourse. The landowner's goal is to maximize the amount of the harvest they keep. Given these conditions, what allocation of work hours and food is the landowner most likely to impose?
Evaluating the Sustainability of Coercive Labor
In an economic model of forced labor where a landowner controls a worker through the threat of violence, the maximum amount of output the landowner can extract is limited only by the worker's physical capacity to produce.
An individual initially works for themselves on a plot of land, choosing to labor 8 hours a day to produce enough food for a comfortable living. A powerful landowner then takes control of the land and, through credible threats of violence, can force the individual to work. The landowner's goal is to claim the largest possible share of the harvest for themselves, while providing the worker just enough to survive and continue working. How will the worker's situation most likely change?
Evaluating a Landowner's Coercive Strategy
Consider two economic scenarios involving a worker on a plot of land. In one, the worker is an independent farmer. In the other, a powerful landowner controls the worker through coercion. Match each scenario with its defining characteristic.
Role of External Authority in Coercive Labor