Expected Shirking Duration (s) as a Best Estimate Under Uncertainty
In the labour discipline model, an employee's decision to shirk is made under uncertainty, as the moment of being caught is a matter of chance. The model assumes that the employee simplifies this by using the expected (or average) number of weeks they can shirk before detection, denoted by 's'. This value serves as the employee's best estimate for calculating the potential payoff from shirking.
0
1
Tags
Science
Economy
CORE Econ
Social Science
Empirical Science
Economics
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Ch.6 The firm and its employees - The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Related
Comparing Payoffs for Maria's Shirking vs. No-Shirking Options (Figure 6.9)
Employee's Optimal Effort Decision
An employee earns $20 per hour. They can choose to exert full effort, which they experience as a cost equivalent to $3 per hour. Alternatively, they can exert no effort. If they exert no effort, there is a 10% chance each hour that they will be caught and lose their job. The total economic loss if they are fired is valued at $120. To maximize their net hourly gain, what is the employee's best course of action?
An employee is paid a wage where their net benefit from working hard is exactly equal to their expected net benefit from shirking. The firm then invests in a new surveillance system that increases the probability of detecting a shirking employee. Assuming the wage and all other conditions remain the same, how does this change affect the employee's best response?
Evaluating a Manager's Wage Strategy
An employee receives an hourly wage of $25. The personal cost (disutility) of exerting full effort is equivalent to $4 per hour. If this employee were to be fired, the total economic loss is valued at $150. At what hourly probability of being caught for not exerting effort would the employee be exactly indifferent between working with full effort and not exerting effort?
An employee is paid an hourly wage and has determined that their best response is to exert full effort. This is because the net benefit from working hard is currently greater than the expected net benefit from shirking. Which of the following changes, holding all else constant, would be most likely to cause this employee to change their best response to shirking?
An employee earns an hourly wage and experiences a disutility of effort equivalent to $2 per hour when working diligently. If they choose not to work diligently, there is a 5% chance per hour of being caught and fired. For the employee to be motivated to work diligently, the total economic loss from being fired must be at least $____.
Consulting on Employee Motivation
A firm operates in a city where the cost of job loss for an employee is high. The government then introduces a new policy that substantially increases unemployment benefits. Assuming the firm does not change the wage or its monitoring practices, how will this policy change likely affect a typical employee's decision-making process regarding work effort?
A manager wants to ensure an employee exerts effort. The personal cost (disutility) of exerting effort for the employee is valued at $2 per hour. The total economic loss for the employee if they are fired is estimated to be $80. What is the minimum hourly probability of detecting an employee who is not working that the manager must establish to make working diligently the employee's best response?
Employee's Decision Calculus: The Role of Future Consequences
Expected Shirking Duration (s) as a Best Estimate Under Uncertainty
Maria's Two Choices: Exerting Effort vs. Shirking
Assumption of Using Expected Shirking Duration in Payoff Calculation
Learn After
An employee knows there is a consistent, but random, chance they will be caught if they decide not to put in effort during any given pay period. To decide whether the risk is worth it, they need to weigh the benefit of avoiding effort against the potential cost of being fired. According to the standard economic model for this situation, how should the employee approach calculating the total potential benefit of shirking?
Employee Decision-Making Under Uncertainty
Impact of Monitoring on Shirking Calculations
In the economic model of an employee's decision to shirk, the 'expected shirking duration' (s) represents a guaranteed period during which the employee can shirk without being caught.
A firm implements a new, more effective employee monitoring system, which increases the probability that an employee who is not working diligently will be caught in any given week. From the perspective of an employee who is deciding whether or not to exert effort, how does this change primarily influence their calculation of the potential gains from shirking?
Calculating Expected Shirking Duration
The Role of 'Expected Shirking Duration' in Employee Decision-Making
An employee at a call center knows that there is a constant 5% probability of their performance being audited in any given week, and if audited while not meeting targets, they will be fired. To decide whether to exert effort, the employee needs to estimate the potential gains from shirking. Which of the following statements best analyzes how the employee should incorporate the 5% risk into their decision-making process?
An employee calculates the potential net gain from shirking by comparing the value of avoiding effort over an expected period ('s') with the total cost of eventually being fired. The firm they work for suddenly announces a significant increase in the company-wide bonus paid to all employees who remain with the firm for the entire year. Assuming the probability of being caught shirking remains unchanged, how does this announcement alter the employee's decision-making process regarding shirking?
Two employees are considering whether to exert full effort in their jobs. Employee A works in a department where performance is reviewed, on average, once every four weeks. Employee B works in a department where performance is reviewed, on average, once every week. Assuming all other conditions are identical, how does this difference in review frequency influence their respective calculations of the potential benefit from shirking?
In the economic model of an employee's decision to shirk, the 'expected shirking duration' (s) represents a guaranteed period during which the employee can shirk without being caught.