Figure 1.1: The History's Hockey Stick Graph of GDP Per Capita
Figure 1.1, known as the 'history's hockey stick' graph, displays the progression of GDP per capita for several countries from 1000 to 2018. The official caption for the figure specifies five countries, though the graph itself plots data for six. In this visualization, the vertical position of each line serves as an estimate of the average living standards for a given year on the horizontal axis. The graph is based on the best available historical data, which is subject to ongoing refinement, and it clearly illustrates the 'hockey stick' growth pattern: a long era of economic flatness followed by a rapid increase. While this graph provides a powerful illustration, it is not exhaustive; more comprehensive data for other countries is available through interactive charts. It is a fundamental visual for understanding the dramatic and recent surge in living standards in certain parts of the world.
0
1
Contributors are:
Who are from:
Tags
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Economy
CORE Econ
The Economy 1.0 @ CORE Econ
Ch.1 The Capitalist Revolution - The Economy 1.0 @ CORE Econ
Economics
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
Ch.1 Prosperity, inequality, and planetary limits - The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Related
History’s Hockey Stick: Stagnant Income Before Sustained Growth
Capitalism, Causation, and History’s Hockey Stick
India's Progress in Living Standards and Persistent Poverty (14th Century to Present)
Living Standards Visualization: Pre-1800 Limitations
Intra-Country vs. Inter-Country Inequality in the 14th-17th Centuries
Purchasing Power Parity (PPP)
Latin American Growth
Figure 1.1: The History's Hockey Stick Graph of GDP Per Capita
China's Economic Decline
Modern Global Wealth Hierarchy (2018): Comparisons of Japan, India, Britain, US, and Norway
Britain's Early and Gradual 'Hockey Stick' Kink
Japan's Sharp 'Hockey Stick' Kink around 1870
Pre-1800 GDP Data Scarcity and Its Impact on Historical Graphs
Data Sources for the History's Hockey Stick Graph
Understanding and Interpreting Ratio Scale Graphs
An economist plots the GDP per capita of two countries, Country X and Country Y, from 2000 to 2020 on a graph with a ratio scale on the vertical axis. In 2000, Country X had a much higher GDP per capita than Country Y. However, over the 20-year period, Country Y experienced a significantly faster average annual growth rate than Country X. Based on this information, which statement best describes how the two lines would appear on the graph?
Choosing the Right Economic Visualization
Consider two countries, Country A and Country B. In a given year, Country A's income per person is $40,000 and it increases by $2,000 the following year. In the same period, Country B's income per person is $10,000 and it increases by $1,000. Which of the following statements provides the most accurate economic comparison?
An economic historian is studying two countries, Alpha and Beta, over a 50-year period. She plots their income per person on a graph where the vertical axis uses a ratio scale. The line for Country Alpha starts at a much higher point on the axis than the line for Country Beta. Over the 50 years, the line for Alpha is nearly flat, while the line for Beta is a steep, upward-sloping straight line. What is the most accurate conclusion the historian can draw from this graph?
Evaluating an Economic Analysis
When examining a graph that plots a country's income per person over several decades using a ratio scale on the vertical axis, a straight, upward-sloping line signifies that the absolute (e.g., dollar amount) increase in income per person was constant year after year.
Evaluating an Investment Recommendation
Interpreting Economic Performance
An economic analyst is comparing two countries, Country A and Country B. In 1990, Country A's income per person was ten times that of Country B. Over the subsequent 30 years, Country A's income per person grew at an average rate of 1% per year, while Country B's grew at an average rate of 7% per year. Which of the following statements provides the most accurate analysis of their relative economic situations after this 30-year period?
An economic historian is comparing the long-term development of two nations, Country A and Country B, by plotting their income per person on a graph with a ratio scale on the vertical axis. Historical data reveals the following:
- Country A had a relatively high income per person 300 years ago and has experienced a slow but consistent proportional increase in income ever since.
- Country B had a very low income per person 300 years ago, which remained stagnant for the first 250 years, but has g
Delayed Economic Growth in China and India Until Post-Colonial Independence
Catch-Up Growth of 'Latecomer' Economies: India and China
Figure 3.7: Evolution of GDP per Capita Relative to the US (US = 100) at Purchasing Power Parity (2009–2023)
Latin American Growth
China's Economic Decline
India's Progress in Living Standards and Persistent Poverty (14th Century to Present)
Living Standards Visualization: Pre-1800 Limitations
Figure 1.1: The History's Hockey Stick Graph of GDP Per Capita
Comparing GDP Per Capita Levels and Growth Rates Across Nations
GDP's Interactions with Wellbeing
Britain's Early and Gradual 'Hockey Stick' Kink
Japan's Sharp 'Hockey Stick' Kink around 1870
GDP Per Capita as a Measure of Average Living Standards
Role of Income in Accessing Economic Output
Impact of Income Inequality on Wellbeing with Constant Average Income
Challenges in Measuring Aggregate Output
Role of National Statistical Agencies in Measuring Economic Output
Circular Flow Model of the Economy
Exports
Nominal GDP
Role of Statistical Agencies in GDP Estimation
Challenges in Measuring GDP Accurately
Rationale for Using Total GDP for Economic Size Analysis
Imports as a Function of Domestic Income
GDP Composition and Future Growth
Learn After
History’s Hockey Stick: Stagnant Income Before Sustained Growth
Capitalism, Causation, and History’s Hockey Stick
Italy's Higher Living Standards in the 14th Century
Pre-1800 GDP Data Scarcity and Its Impact on Historical Graphs
Data Sources for the History's Hockey Stick Graph
Official Caption for Figure 1.1 (History's Hockey Stick)
Global Disparities in Living Standards by 2018
The Foundational Role of Empirical Data in Economics
A graph displays the estimated average income per person for several major countries from the year 1000 to the present. The data shows that for most of this millennium, average incomes were low and changed very little. Then, beginning in the 18th and 19th centuries for some countries, incomes started to rise very rapidly. This overall pattern is often described as a 'hockey stick' shape. Based on this information, what is the most significant analytical conclusion that can be drawn?
Interpreting Historical Economic Data
Based on the general pattern shown in the 'history's hockey stick' graph of GDP per capita, it is accurate to conclude that for most of the countries depicted, the average person's material living standard in the year 1600 was fundamentally similar to that of the year 1200.
Analyzing Economic Divergence
Interpreting Historical Data Visualization
A graph shows the average income per person for a country like Britain from the year 1000 to the present. The graph has a distinct shape. Arrange the following descriptions of the country's economic history in the correct chronological order as depicted by this graph.
A graph of average income per person from the year 1000 to the present for several countries shows a long, flat section followed by a sharp, upward bend. Match each feature or observation from this type of graph to its correct economic interpretation.
A graph of average income per person for a country from the year 1000 to 2018 shows the period before 1700 as a long, nearly flat horizontal line. Which of the following statements provides the most accurate interpretation of this flat portion of the graph?
An economic historian is studying short-term, year-to-year economic volatility (e.g., the impact of a major famine) in a European country during the 15th century. They consult a long-run graph of average income per person from the year 1000 to the present, which depicts the 15th century as part of a long, nearly flat line. Why is this graph likely to be a misleading source for investigating year-to-year volatility during that specific period?
The historical graph of average income per person, which shows a long period of economic stagnation followed by a sudden and sharp increase in growth, is commonly referred to as the 'history's ____ ____' graph.
Based on the general pattern shown in the 'history's hockey stick' graph of GDP per capita, it is accurate to conclude that for most of the countries depicted, the average person's material living standard in the year 1600 was fundamentally similar to that of the year 1200.
Analyzing Economic Divergence