Global Disparities in Living Standards by 2018
By 2018, the long-term economic trends illustrated by the 'hockey stick' graph had resulted in vast differences in average living standards across countries. For example, the average person in Japan was six times better off than in India. Japan's living standards were nearly on par with Britain's, a relative position similar to what it was in the 14th century. Meanwhile, countries like the US and Norway, not shown on the specific graph, had achieved even higher levels of average income.
0
1
Tags
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Economy
CORE Econ
The Economy 1.0 @ CORE Econ
Ch.1 The Capitalist Revolution - The Economy 1.0 @ CORE Econ
Economics
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
Ch.1 Prosperity, inequality, and planetary limits - The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Related
History’s Hockey Stick: Stagnant Income Before Sustained Growth
Capitalism, Causation, and History’s Hockey Stick
Italy's Higher Living Standards in the 14th Century
Pre-1800 GDP Data Scarcity and Its Impact on Historical Graphs
Data Sources for the History's Hockey Stick Graph
Official Caption for Figure 1.1 (History's Hockey Stick)
Global Disparities in Living Standards by 2018
The Foundational Role of Empirical Data in Economics
A graph displays the estimated average income per person for several major countries from the year 1000 to the present. The data shows that for most of this millennium, average incomes were low and changed very little. Then, beginning in the 18th and 19th centuries for some countries, incomes started to rise very rapidly. This overall pattern is often described as a 'hockey stick' shape. Based on this information, what is the most significant analytical conclusion that can be drawn?
Interpreting Historical Economic Data
Based on the general pattern shown in the 'history's hockey stick' graph of GDP per capita, it is accurate to conclude that for most of the countries depicted, the average person's material living standard in the year 1600 was fundamentally similar to that of the year 1200.
Analyzing Economic Divergence
Interpreting Historical Data Visualization
A graph shows the average income per person for a country like Britain from the year 1000 to the present. The graph has a distinct shape. Arrange the following descriptions of the country's economic history in the correct chronological order as depicted by this graph.
A graph of average income per person from the year 1000 to the present for several countries shows a long, flat section followed by a sharp, upward bend. Match each feature or observation from this type of graph to its correct economic interpretation.
A graph of average income per person for a country from the year 1000 to 2018 shows the period before 1700 as a long, nearly flat horizontal line. Which of the following statements provides the most accurate interpretation of this flat portion of the graph?
An economic historian is studying short-term, year-to-year economic volatility (e.g., the impact of a major famine) in a European country during the 15th century. They consult a long-run graph of average income per person from the year 1000 to the present, which depicts the 15th century as part of a long, nearly flat line. Why is this graph likely to be a misleading source for investigating year-to-year volatility during that specific period?
The historical graph of average income per person, which shows a long period of economic stagnation followed by a sudden and sharp increase in growth, is commonly referred to as the 'history's ____ ____' graph.
Based on the general pattern shown in the 'history's hockey stick' graph of GDP per capita, it is accurate to conclude that for most of the countries depicted, the average person's material living standard in the year 1600 was fundamentally similar to that of the year 1200.
Analyzing Economic Divergence
Learn After
Considering the long-term economic developments that occurred globally, which statement provides the most accurate analysis of the differences in average living standards across various countries by the year 2018?
Explaining Global Income Divergence
Evaluate the following statement based on the state of the global economy by 2018: The long-term economic trends had led to a significant narrowing of the gap in average living standards between all countries, such as between Japan and India.
Analyzing Global Economic Divergence
Match each country with the description that best represents its relative average living standards by 2018, reflecting the outcomes of long-term economic growth patterns.
Evaluating the Impact of Divergent Economic Growth
The significant divergence in long-term economic growth across the globe resulted in a situation by 2018 where the average person in Japan was approximately ____ times better off than the average person in India, highlighting the vast disparities in living standards.
Arrange the following countries/groups in ascending order (from lowest to highest) of their approximate average living standards around the year 2018, based on an analysis of long-term economic growth which revealed significant global disparities.
An economic historian observes that by 2018, the average living standard in Japan was nearly on par with that of Great Britain, a relationship similar to what existed in the 14th century. In contrast, the average living standard in Japan was vastly higher than in India. What does this set of comparisons primarily illustrate about long-term global economic development?
Based on an analysis of long-term economic trends leading up to 2018, which statement best characterizes the global distribution of average living standards?