Learn Before
Methodology of the Milgram Experiment
The methodology of Stanley Milgram's obedience experiment involved initially recruiting 40 men and deceiving them into thinking they were in a study to improve learning and memory. Participants, acting as 'teachers,' were instructed to teach other students ('learners') and administer escalating electric shocks for incorrect answers. The participants believed they were delivering shocks that increased in 15-volt increments, up to a maximum of 450 volts. A key part of the procedure was the learner, a confederate, acting out a script of increasing distress, which included crying for help, begging the teacher to stop, and complaining of heart trouble. The central deception was that no actual shocks were administered.
0
1
Tags
Ch.12 Social Psychology - Psychology @ OpenStax
Psychology @ OpenStax
Introduction to Psychology @ OpenStax Course
OpenStax
OpenStax Psychology (2nd ed.) Textbook
Psychology
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Related
What was the primary finding of Stanley Milgram's experiment on obedience?
What historical context motivated Stanley Milgram to conduct his experiment on obedience?
What ethical concerns were raised by Stanley Milgram's experiment on obedience?
What was the main purpose of Stanley Milgram's experiment on obedience?
Milgram Experiment Recruitment Advertisement
Influence of the Eichmann Trial on Milgram's Research
The Problem of Destructive Obedience
Milgram Experiment Results by Shock Level
Variations of the Milgram Experiment
Contemporary Relevance of the Milgram Experiment
Research Confederate
Inspiration for Milgram's Obedience Study
Ethical Implications of the Milgram Experiment
Why is the Milgram experiment considered a prominent example of active deception in psychological research?
Although the Milgram experiment caused severe psychological stress to its participants, it highlighted that certain socially important psychological phenomena are difficult to study effectively without the use of deception.
Based on the design and execution of the Milgram experiment, match each experimental component with the psychological or methodological concept it represents in practice.
Analyze the structural logic and ethical trade-offs of the Milgram experiment by arranging its components in the correct sequence, from the initial methodological requirement to the final scientific justification.
Suppose you are tasked with designing a contemporary social psychology study that synthesizes the methodological framework of the Milgram experiment to investigate why individuals comply with requests to spread 'harmful misinformation' online. Which of the following research plans represents the most coherent integration of the experiment's core components into this new context?
Methodology of the Milgram Experiment
If a critic argues that the knowledge gained about obedience does not outweigh the harm caused to the participants, they are specifically challenging the _____ of the Milgram experiment, which is the evaluative standard used to defend the use of active deception for socially important questions.
In the Milgram experiment, the person who played the role of the learner was actually a(n) _____, an individual who is secretly working for the researcher and follows a script to mislead the actual participant.
A researcher designs a study on obedience where participants are instructed by an authority figure to delete files from a student's computer. The program used is actually a dummy simulation that only mimics file deletion. According to the methodology of the Milgram experiment, this dummy program represents a confederate used to actively deceive the participants.
Analyze the design elements of the Milgram experiment and match each methodological component with its correct description based on the study's framework.
Evaluate the research logic and ethical trade-offs of the Milgram experiment by ordering the events from the initial methodological need to the final scientific justification.