Learn Before
Milgram Experiment Results by Shock Level
The results of the Milgram experiment demonstrated a surprising degree of obedience to authority, showing a progressive decrease in compliance as the instructed shock intensity increased. While all or nearly all participants administered shocks in the 'slight to moderate' range (15–135 volts), the participation percentage dropped to about 80% for 'strong to very strong' shocks (135–255 volts). A further decline was observed at the 'intense to extremely intense' level (255–375 volts), where approximately 65% (two out of three) of participants continued to administer shocks to an unresponsive learner. Notably, this rate of obedience remained stable at about 65% for the highest levels of shock, from 'severe' (375–435 volts) up to the maximum XXX (435–450 volts) designation.
0
1
Tags
Ch.12 Social Psychology - Psychology @ OpenStax
Psychology @ OpenStax
Introduction to Psychology @ OpenStax Course
OpenStax
OpenStax Psychology (2nd ed.) Textbook
Psychology
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Related
What was the primary finding of Stanley Milgram's experiment on obedience?
What historical context motivated Stanley Milgram to conduct his experiment on obedience?
What ethical concerns were raised by Stanley Milgram's experiment on obedience?
What was the main purpose of Stanley Milgram's experiment on obedience?
Milgram Experiment Recruitment Advertisement
Influence of the Eichmann Trial on Milgram's Research
The Problem of Destructive Obedience
Milgram Experiment Results by Shock Level
Variations of the Milgram Experiment
Contemporary Relevance of the Milgram Experiment
Research Confederate
Inspiration for Milgram's Obedience Study
Ethical Implications of the Milgram Experiment
Why is the Milgram experiment considered a prominent example of active deception in psychological research?
Although the Milgram experiment caused severe psychological stress to its participants, it highlighted that certain socially important psychological phenomena are difficult to study effectively without the use of deception.
Based on the design and execution of the Milgram experiment, match each experimental component with the psychological or methodological concept it represents in practice.
Analyze the structural logic and ethical trade-offs of the Milgram experiment by arranging its components in the correct sequence, from the initial methodological requirement to the final scientific justification.
Suppose you are tasked with designing a contemporary social psychology study that synthesizes the methodological framework of the Milgram experiment to investigate why individuals comply with requests to spread 'harmful misinformation' online. Which of the following research plans represents the most coherent integration of the experiment's core components into this new context?
Methodology of the Milgram Experiment
If a critic argues that the knowledge gained about obedience does not outweigh the harm caused to the participants, they are specifically challenging the _____ of the Milgram experiment, which is the evaluative standard used to defend the use of active deception for socially important questions.
In the Milgram experiment, the person who played the role of the learner was actually a(n) _____, an individual who is secretly working for the researcher and follows a script to mislead the actual participant.
A researcher designs a study on obedience where participants are instructed by an authority figure to delete files from a student's computer. The program used is actually a dummy simulation that only mimics file deletion. According to the methodology of the Milgram experiment, this dummy program represents a confederate used to actively deceive the participants.
Analyze the design elements of the Milgram experiment and match each methodological component with its correct description based on the study's framework.
Evaluate the research logic and ethical trade-offs of the Milgram experiment by ordering the events from the initial methodological need to the final scientific justification.
Learn After
In a famous psychological study, participants were instructed by an authority figure to deliver a series of what they believed were increasingly powerful electric shocks to another person. The results showed that while nearly all participants administered shocks labeled 'slight to moderate,' the number of participants continuing dropped as the shocks were labeled 'intense' and 'extremely intense.' However, for those who administered the 'extremely intense' shocks (375 volts), the rate of obedience remained relatively stable up to the maximum 450-volt shock. What is the most accurate conclusion to draw from this specific pattern of results?
In a famous psychological study, participants were instructed by an authority figure to deliver a series of what they believed were increasingly powerful electric shocks to another person. The results showed that while nearly all participants administered shocks labeled 'slight to moderate,' the number of participants continuing dropped as the shocks were labeled 'intense' and 'extremely intense.' However, for those who administered the 'extremely intense' shocks (375 volts), the rate of obedience remained relatively stable up to the maximum 450-volt shock. What is the most accurate conclusion to draw from this specific pattern of results?