Applied synthesis for 1Cademy’s proposed topic/link decisions (undated page; captured November 9, 2026): the 2011 equal-time recall/rereading-versus-visible-mapping contrast cannot credit diagram format for contributor learning. The 2014 design shows why a contributor’s map does not identify whether memory recall was required.

The 2023 fact-question comparison includes time diverted from construction to map memorization—not original-text restudy; failure to detect a difference does not prove equal learning.

The 2025 added researcher-made map comparison cannot isolate collaboration shared by both groups; individual factual scores and pair summaries are immediate outcomes, not community link-review decisions. Author-selected relationships are not verified necessary prerequisites. Its exploratory reading-time finding establishes neither delayed application to new AI-generated scientific arguments nor total community-review savings. These studies neither establish nor refute 1Cademy’s scientific-oversight efficacy.