Case Study

Based on the provided context, explain why Dr. Aris must use a non-experimental design for this study, identifying the specific constraint that prevents an experimental design.

Case context: Dr. Aris is interested in studying how experiencing a high-magnitude natural disaster affects long-term mental health outcomes in survivors. Because she cannot randomly assign participants to experience a natural disaster, she uses a non-experimental design.

Question: Based on the provided context, explain why Dr. Aris must use a non-experimental design for this study, identifying the specific constraint that prevents an experimental design.

Sample answer: Dr. Aris must use a non-experimental design because she is investigating a potential causal link where manipulating the independent variable (exposure to a high-magnitude natural disaster) is ethically and practically impossible. It is unethical to expose participants to harm, and practically impossible to control natural disasters.

Key points:

  • Manipulation of the independent variable is ethically impossible due to participant safety.
  • Manipulation of the independent variable is practically impossible due to the nature of natural disasters.
  • The study investigates a potential causal link where manipulation is constrained.

Rubric: Full credit is awarded if the student correctly identifies that the independent variable cannot be manipulated due to practical or ethical constraints, explaining that exposing participants to natural disasters is unethical and impossible to control.

0

1

Updated 2026-05-26

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

KPU

Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU

Related