Comparing effects of different writing activities on reading comprehension: A meta-analysis - Discussion
RQ1: effectiveness of writing on reading comprehension
- Did not find evidence that one type of writing exercise was more effective than the others in terms of reading comprehension outcomes among summaries, questions, note-taking, and extended writing
- Meta-analyses of the comparisons could be underpowered because at most 7 studies were considered for each comparison group
RQ2: effectiveness based on outcome measures
- Statistically significant effect sizes for free recall for summary vs. question comparison
- No statistically significant effect sizes for free recall in questions vs. notes or questions vs. essay writing
- Free recall relies on studies recalling main ideas, which is most closely aligned with summaries more so than notes or questions on specific details
0
1
Tags
Psychology
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Related
Comparing effects of different writing activities on reading comprehension: A meta-analysis
Comparing effects of different writing activities on reading comprehension: A meta-analysis - Literature Review
Comparing effects of different writing activities on reading comprehension: A meta-analysis - Method
Comparing effects of different writing activities on reading comprehension: A meta-analysis - Results
Comparing effects of different writing activities on reading comprehension: A meta-analysis - Discussion
Comparing effects of different writing activities on reading comprehension: A meta-analysis - Limitations
Comparing effects of different writing activities on reading comprehension: A meta-analysis - Further Research