A source of information about ourselves that comes from evaluating our abilities, achievements, attitudes, and other attributes based on how they compare to others.

Social comparison

Which of the following best defines a context effect in psychological research?

A context effect, or contrast effect, is a specific carryover effect where being tested in one condition alters how participants perceive stimuli or interpret their task in later conditions. For example, an average-looking individual might be judged more harshly if participants have just finished evaluating a highly attractive person, demonstrating how the sequence of exposure skews subsequent judgments.

Google

University of Michigan - Ann Arbor

Judgement is relative. How we think about a person or event depends on the context surrounding it. 

Social context

A carryover effect is a specific type of order effect that occurs when a participant's behavior or response in one experimental condition is directly influenced by having been tested in a prior condition. When these effects are not the primary focus of the research, they can become problematic confounding variables, making it difficult to determine whether changes in the dependent variable are due to the independent variable or merely the lingering impact of previous conditions.

Carryover Effect

Aronson, Elliot, and Joshua Aronson. The Social Animal. Worth Publishers, Macmillan Learning, 2018.

The Social Animal

https://kpu.pressbooks.pub/psychmethods4e/

KPU Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition

Context Effect

A fatigue effect is a specific type of carryover effect where participants perform a task worse in subsequent experimental conditions because they have become physically or mentally tired, or bored, from participating in earlier conditions. If the order of conditions is not properly controlled, this decline in performance can serve as a confounding variable that obscures the true effect of the independent variable.

Fatigue Effect

A practice effect is a specific type of carryover effect in within-subjects experiments where participants perform a task better in later experimental conditions. This improvement occurs not because of the experimental manipulation, but simply because the participants have gained experience and had the opportunity to practice the task during earlier conditions.

Practice Effect

When deciding between experimental approaches, researchers generally prioritize the within-subjects design if practical. A good rule of thumb is to opt for a within-subjects experiment—utilizing proper counterbalancing—if there is sufficient time to test each participant in all conditions and if there are no serious concerns about confounding carryover effects. If these conditions cannot be met, researchers should consider a between-subjects design instead.

Rule of Thumb for Experimental Design Choice

In a taste-testing experiment, participants first drink a highly sweetened, strongly flavored soda and then immediately taste a mild, lightly flavored sparkling water. If the intense sweetness of the first drink temporarily dulls their taste buds and alters how they perceive the sparkling water, what is this confounding variable called?

Learn Before

Related

Learn After