Learn Before
Case Study

Diagnose the error in the researcher's causal conclusion. Explain how the variables behave in this specific correlation, classify the direction of this relationship, and justify why the observed statistical association does not support the researcher's claim of causation.

Case context: A psychology researcher conducts a study on adolescent behavior. The researcher measures two variables: daily television viewing hours and final exam scores. The study reveals a statistical association where high values of television viewing hours are associated with low values of exam scores. Based on this finding, the researcher publishes a report concluding that watching television causes students to perform poorly on their exams.

Question: Diagnose the error in the researcher's causal conclusion. Explain how the variables behave in this specific correlation, classify the direction of this relationship, and justify why the observed statistical association does not support the researcher's claim of causation.

Sample answer: The researcher made the error of assuming that correlation implies causation. In this scenario, high values of television viewing hours are associated with low values of exam scores, which indicates a negative correlation. However, because a statistical link between two variables does not necessarily mean that one causes the other, the researcher cannot conclude that watching television directly causes the lower exam scores.

Key points:

  • The researcher incorrectly concludes that correlation implies causation.
  • The relationship is a negative correlation because high television viewing hours are associated with low exam scores.
  • A statistical link between television and exam scores does not mean that one variable causes the other.

Rubric: Grading Rubric: - 1 point: Correctly diagnoses the error as concluding causation from a correlation. - 1 point: Classifies the relationship as a negative correlation, explaining that high television hours are associated with low exam scores. - 1 point: Justifies why the claim is unsupported by stating that a statistical link between two variables does not mean that one causes the other.

0

1

Updated 2026-05-26

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

KPU

Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU

Related