Factors Influencing Ultimatum Game Outcomes
The outcomes of the ultimatum game are shaped by key factors beyond pure self-interest, such as social norms and personal preferences for fairness. This is demonstrated by experimental results which show that, contrary to the predictions for a purely self-interested actor (Homo economicus), most Proposers do not make the lowest possible offer, indicating that they account for these social factors in their decisions.
0
1
Tags
Library Science
Economics
Economy
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
CORE Econ
Ch.4 Strategic interactions and social dilemmas - The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Related
Predicted Outcome of the Ultimatum Game with Self-Interested Players
The Proposer's Strategic Decision
In a game, a 'Proposer' is given $100 and must offer a portion of it to a 'Responder'. The Responder can either accept the offer, and the money is split as proposed, or reject it, and both players receive nothing. If you are the Responder, which of the following best represents the fundamental trade-off you must evaluate when deciding on your minimum acceptable offer?
Proposer's Dilemma: Risk vs. Reward
Proposer's Dilemma: Risk vs. Reward
The Proposer's Strategic Dilemma
In a game where one person (the 'Proposer') is given $100 and must offer a portion of it to a second person (the 'Responder'), what is the central strategic conflict the Proposer must resolve? The Responder can accept the offer, in which case the money is split as proposed, or reject it, in which case both individuals receive nothing.
In a one-time interaction, a 'Proposer' is given $100 and must offer a portion to a 'Responder'. The Responder can either accept the offer, splitting the money as proposed, or reject it, in which case both players receive nothing. The Proposer offers $20. If the Responder rejects this offer, which statement best analyzes the strategic failure in this interaction?
In a one-time interaction, a 'Proposer' is given $100 and must offer a portion to a 'Responder'. If the Responder accepts, the money is split as proposed; if they reject, both get nothing. The Proposer believes the Responder is highly likely to reject any offer below $30. Given this belief, which of the following statements provides the most accurate evaluation of the Proposer's strategic options?
True or False: In a one-time interaction where a 'Proposer' is given $100 to split with a 'Responder', the Proposer's primary strategic task is to determine the maximum amount they can keep, without considering the possibility that the Responder might reject the offer.
Factors Influencing Ultimatum Game Outcomes
Behavior of a Purely Self-Interested Responder in the Ultimatum Game
In a one-time interaction, one person (the 'Proposer') is given a sum of money and must offer a portion of it to a second person (the 'Responder'). The Responder can either accept the offer, and the money is split as proposed, or reject it, and both players receive nothing. Match each player with their primary strategic challenge.
Learn After
Responder's Decision Rule with Reciprocal Preferences
Responder's Punitive Reaction to Offers Breaching Social Norms
In a one-shot game where a 'Proposer' is given $100 and must offer a portion to a 'Responder', who can either accept or reject the offer (if rejected, neither player gets anything), experimental results consistently show two things: 1) Proposers most frequently offer between $40 and $50. 2) Responders often reject offers below $20. What is the most logical conclusion to draw from this evidence about the players' motivations?
Predicting Offers Based on Social Context
Evaluating the Homo economicus Model in the Ultimatum Game
In a one-shot ultimatum game where a Proposer is given $10 to split, a Proposer behaving as a purely self-interested actor (Homo economicus) would offer the Responder $5, as this is the fairest split and most likely to be accepted.
Explaining Proposer Behavior in the Ultimatum Game
In a one-shot game, a 'Proposer' is given a sum of money and must offer a portion to a 'Responder'. The Responder can either accept the offer (in which case they both get the agreed-upon split) or reject it (in which case both players get nothing). Match each player's motivation to their most likely action in this game.
A 'Proposer' in a one-shot game is given $100 to split with a 'Responder'. The Proposer knows that the Responder can reject the offer, in which case both players receive nothing. The Proposer is not a purely self-interested actor and considers social factors. Arrange the following steps to reflect the Proposer's most likely logical thought process when deciding on an offer.
In a one-shot game where a 'Proposer' offers a split of a sum of money to a 'Responder', experimental results show that Proposers often offer a significant portion (e.g., 40-50%) of the total sum. This behavior, which deviates from the prediction for a purely self-interested actor, indicates that the Proposer's decision is heavily influenced by their perception of social ____.
Analyzing Proposer Behavior Across Different Social Contexts
In a one-shot game, a 'Proposer' is given $10 to split with a 'Responder'. If the Responder rejects the offer, both players receive $0. A purely self-interested Proposer would offer the smallest possible positive amount (e.g., $1), assuming the Responder would accept any gain over nothing. However, in real experiments, Proposers often offer a much larger share, such as $4. Which of the following statements best analyzes the Proposer's strategic thinking behind offering $4 instead of $1?