Results Hypothesis 6 (Designs of concept maps and their impacts on readers’ performance in memory and reasoning while reading)
Post hoc analyses show that the significant results were primarily explained by the differences between the thematic map group and the no map group for the valid propositions, and between the thematic map group and the other two groups for the invalid propositions. These results suggest that the thematic map provided the most straightforward framework of arguments from which the participants could synthesise the arguments of the second text.
The comprehensive concept map contains more details that led to less efficient syntheses, as these contained more invalid representations (this supports Hypothesis 6).
0
2
Tags
Psychology
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Related
Results Hypothesis 1 (Designs of concept maps and their impacts on readers’ performance in memory and reasoning while reading)
Results Hypothesis 2 (Designs of concept maps and their impacts on readers’ performance in memory and reasoning while reading)
Results Hypothesis 3 (Designs of concept maps and their impacts on readers’ performance in memory and reasoning while reading)
Results Hypothesis 4 (Designs of concept maps and their impacts on readers’ performance in memory and reasoning while reading)
Results Hypothesis 5 (Designs of concept maps and their impacts on readers’ performance in memory and reasoning while reading)
Results Hypothesis 6 (Designs of concept maps and their impacts on readers’ performance in memory and reasoning while reading)