Duplicate data publication is a breach of scholarly integrity where researchers publish the same dataset a second time, presenting it as though it were new, original research. This practice is unethical because it distorts the scientific literature and misleadingly amplifies the impact of a single set of findings.

Duplicate Data Publication

As a principle of scholarly integrity, researchers are ethically expected to share their data with other professionals. Making data available allows other researchers to verify the findings and promotes transparency and collaboration within the scientific community.

Data Sharing in Research

An important aspect of scholarly integrity is the obligation of peer reviewers to maintain the confidentiality of the unpublished research they evaluate. Reviewers must keep the contents and ideas of the manuscript secret until the research is formally published.

Confidentiality in Peer Review

Data fabrication is a violation of scholarly integrity that occurs when a researcher invents non-existent data. Because the scientific goal is to understand the world as it actually is, researchers have a duty to report their findings honestly and accurately. Therefore, they must never fabricate data, even if the actual findings contradict their hypotheses or expectations.

Data Fabrication

During the publication process, collaborators must address publication credit early on to determine who will be listed as authors on the research and the specific order of those authors. To maintain scholarly integrity, authorship must accurately reflect the importance of each individual's actual contribution to the research.

Publication Credit

Plagiarism is an unethical practice that involves using someone else's words or ideas without giving them proper acknowledgment. In academic research, maintaining scholarly integrity during the writing and publication process requires researchers to actively avoid plagiarism by correctly citing original sources.

Plagiarism

Data falsification, also known as altering results, is a violation of scholarly integrity that occurs when a researcher manipulates, omits, or changes real data. Because the scientific goal is to understand the world as it actually is, researchers have a duty to report their findings honestly and accurately. Therefore, they must never alter their results in any way, even if the actual data contradicts their expectations.

Data Falsification

Self-plagiarism is considered an unethical practice in which researchers publish the same material more than once. This means researchers should not borrow prior phrasing from their own previously published works, similar to how students are prohibited from submitting the exact same assignment to multiple classes.

Self-Plagiarism

According to the APA Ethics Code, which of the following actions is strictly prohibited in order to maintain scholarly integrity?

Researchers must maintain their integrity through the publication process and beyond. Because the scientific goal is to learn about the way the world actually is, researchers have a duty to report their results honestly and accurately. The APA Ethics Code outlines these obligations, which encompass strict prohibitions against data fabrication and plagiarism, as well as the accurate assignment of authorship credit.

Google

The eighth section of the APA Ethics Code focuses specifically on the ethical conduct of psychological research and scholarly publication. It establishes critical standards that researchers are expected to follow, encompassing essential areas such as securing institutional approval, obtaining informed consent, carefully regulating the use of deception, conducting thorough debriefings, ensuring the humane care of animal subjects, and maintaining strict scholarly integrity in reporting results, assigning publication credit, and sharing data.

Standard 8: Research and Publication

The fundamental obligation of any researcher is to know and accept their ethical responsibilities, as ignorance or misunderstanding of standards is never a valid defense against charges of unethical conduct. At a minimum, researchers must comprehensively understand relevant guidelines like the American Psychological Association (APA) Ethics Code, correctly distinguish between minimal risk and at-risk research, and master their institution's specific policies, such as the process for preparing and submitting a research protocol to an Institutional Review Board (IRB). If a study is a course requirement, students must also adhere to specific class procedures. Whenever an ethical standard is ambiguous or an unexpected dilemma arises, the researcher is obligated to actively seek clarification by consulting ethics codes, reviewing how past cases were resolved, or seeking guidance from experienced peers, instructors, or the IRB. Ultimately, the researcher bears full and final responsibility for the ethical execution of their study.

Researcher's Ethical Responsibilities

First published in $$1953$$ and periodically revised, the APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct includes approximately $$150$$ specific ethical standards that psychologists and their students must follow. While much of the code addresses clinical practice, it is particularly relevant to psychological research because it provides detailed, enforceable guidance on issues where general moral principles might be interpreted differently. Standard $$8$$ (Research and Publication) establishes mandatory requirements for institutional approval, informed consent, the regulation of deception, debriefing, animal care, and scholarly integrity.

APA Ethics Code

https://kpu.pressbooks.pub/psychmethods4e/

KPU Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition

Scholarly Integrity

When recruiting participants for a study, psychologists must make reasonable efforts to avoid offering excessive or inappropriate financial or other inducements, as such rewards can become coercive. If researchers offer professional services as an incentive, they must clearly explain the nature of those services, including any associated risks, obligations, and limitations.

Offering Inducements for Research Participation

According to the APA Ethics Code, researchers must uphold scholarly integrity when disseminating their findings. This standard explicitly prohibits the fabrication of data. Furthermore, if psychologists discover significant errors in their already published data, they are ethically obligated to take reasonable steps to correct those errors through a formal correction, retraction, erratum, or other appropriate publication means.

Reporting Research Results

In the context of the APA Ethics Code, psychologists who act as reviewers for materials submitted for presentation, publication, grants, or research proposals have a strict ethical obligation. They must respect the confidentiality and the proprietary rights of the individuals who submitted the information, ensuring the work is not improperly shared or used.

Reviewers

Deception in psychological research occurs when investigators intentionally mislead participants about the nature or purpose of a study. While utilizing deception conflicts with the moral principle of acting with integrity and being truthful, researchers sometimes employ it because certain important scientific questions—such as understanding obedience to authority—are difficult or impossible to study accurately if participants are fully aware of the research design.

Deception in Research

Debriefing is the ethical procedure of informing research participants about the true purpose and design of a study as soon as possible after their participation. During this process, researchers must reveal any deception used, correct any resulting misconceptions, and take proactive steps to minimize or reverse any harm or negative emotions induced during the experiment.

Debriefing

Informed consent is the process of obtaining and documenting an individual's voluntary agreement to participate in a study after they have been fully informed of everything that might reasonably affect their decision. This practice is fundamentally important for respecting a person's autonomy, as it ensures they are aware of the study's true nature, risks, and procedures before agreeing to participate, preventing situations where they might be subjected to undisclosed harms.

Informed Consent

Before beginning a study, researchers must secure formal permission from their institution or course instructor, following specific local policies. This procedure typically requires submitting a detailed research protocol to an oversight committee, like an Institutional Review Board (IRB), to confirm that the proposed study adheres to ethical standards and adequately safeguards participants.

Institutional Approval

Standard 8.09 governs the humane treatment of nonhuman animal subjects in psychological research. Psychologists must acquire, care for, use, and dispose of animals in compliance with all regulations and professional standards. Researchers must make reasonable efforts to minimize pain and discomfort, and may only subject animals to stress or pain when alternative procedures are unavailable and the study's value justifies it.

Humane Care and Use of Animals in Research

While the majority of contemporary psychological research relies on human participants, a significant minority involves nonhuman animal subjects. This practice is especially prevalent in fields such as the study of learning and conditioning, behavioral neuroscience, and the development of surgical or drug therapies for psychological disorders.

Nonhuman Animal Subjects in Research

What is the primary focus of Standard 8 of the APA Ethics Code?

During the study design phase, researchers must proactively identify all potential risks to participants, which include physical harm, psychological stress, and confidentiality violations. Because researchers can easily underestimate these hazards or overlook them entirely compared to how participants perceive them, it is essential to seek input from collaborators, experienced researchers, and non-researchers to properly gauge the severity of potential risks from the participant's perspective.

Identifying Research Risks

A research protocol is a detailed, formal document outlining a proposed scientific study that investigators must submit for institutional approval. It comprehensively describes the study's core objectives, methodological design, step-by-step procedures, risk-benefit assessment, strategies to minimize potential participant harm, and plans for obtaining informed consent and conducting debriefing.

Research Protocol

In psychological research, ethical considerations are not limited merely to the period when data is being collected from participants. Instead, ethical issues are continuous; they emerge during the initial study design and planning phases long before data collection begins, and they continue to arise throughout the analysis, publication process, and even after the study has concluded.

Continuous Nature of Research Ethics

An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a committee established by federally supported institutions to review research protocols for potential ethical problems. It must consist of at least five individuals with diverse backgrounds, including scientists, nonscientists, members of different professions, men, women, and at least one person unaffiliated with the institution. The IRB ensures that research risks are minimized, benefits outweigh risks, procedures are fair, and the informed consent process is adequate.

Institutional Review Board (IRB)

A researcher is studying the effects of stress on cognitive performance. Participants are told they will be solving a series of difficult puzzles. However, the researcher intentionally provides an unsolvable puzzle and introduces loud, intermittent noises to create a stressful environment. After the allotted time, participants are thanked for their time and dismissed without being told that the puzzle was impossible or that the study's real purpose was to observe their reactions to frustration and stress. Which statement best evaluates the ethical standing of this research design?

When evaluating the ethics of psychological research, investigators rely on four widely accepted moral principles: weighing risks against benefits, acting with integrity, seeking justice, and respecting people's rights and dignity. Because essentially everyone agrees on these fundamental ideas, they serve as a universally accepted starting point for assessing how a study impacts research participants, the scientific community, and society at large.

Moral Principles of Scientific Research

In certain psychological studies, such as unrecruited field experiments, obtaining informed consent is not always required. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) may allow researchers to dispense with informed consent in situations where the study is not expected to cause any harm and is conducted entirely within the context of people’s ordinary, everyday activities.

Dispensing With Informed Consent

Confidentiality is an agreement between researchers and participants not to disclose personal information without explicit consent. To actively maintain confidentiality and minimize risks, researchers should keep signed consent forms physically separate from the collected data to prevent linking individuals to their responses. Additionally, researchers should respect privacy by only collecting personal information that is strictly necessary to answer their research question, avoiding irrelevant sensitive details.

Confidentiality

Deception in psychological research can manifest in various forms, not all of which involve actively misleading participants. While active deception involves explicitly presenting false information, passive deception occurs when researchers simply withhold information about the study's full design or purpose, or when they allow participants to make incorrect assumptions—such as leading them to believe they are taking a standard 'memory test' when the true purpose is different.

Forms of Deception in Research

APA Standard $$8.02$$a dictates the specific informational elements that must be included in a written informed consent document for psychological research. Researchers must ensure that their consent forms comprehensively address all points outlined in this standard before allowing participants to read and sign the document.

APA Standard 8.02a

Within the APA's Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct, which standard establishes mandatory requirements for institutional approval, informed consent, the regulation of deception, and animal care in psychological studies?

Learn Before

Related

Learn After