An example of stimulus discrimination can be seen in Pavlov's experiments. His dogs learned to differentiate between the specific tone that was paired with food and other, similar sounds, such as a doorbell. They only produced a conditioned response (salivation) to the tone that reliably predicted the arrival of food, demonstrating their ability to discriminate between stimuli.

Example of Stimulus Discrimination: Pavlov's Dogs

A cat named Tiger demonstrates stimulus discrimination by distinguishing between the sound of a can opener, which predicts she will be fed, and the sound of an electric mixer. Because the mixer's sound is not associated with food, Tiger does not come running to the kitchen when it is on, showing she has learned to respond only to the specific stimulus linked to her meal.

Example of Stimulus Discrimination: Tiger the Cat

A cancer patient named Moisha provides a human example of stimulus discrimination. She learned to associate feeling ill with visits to her oncologist, but not with visits to other types of doctors, such as for an annual physical. This shows she could distinguish between different medical settings and only produced the conditioned response of nausea in the specific context associated with chemotherapy.

Example of Stimulus Discrimination: Moisha the Cancer Patient

A service dog is trained to nudge its owner's leg when it hears a specific, high-pitched smoke alarm. During training, the dog is exposed to various other sounds, such as a doorbell, a telephone ringing, and a lower-pitched fire truck siren, but it is only rewarded for responding to the smoke alarm. After training, the dog reliably nudges its owner at the sound of the smoke alarm but ignores the other sounds. Which statement best explains the dog's behavior?

Organisms use stimulus discrimination to distinguish between similar stimuli in their environment. This ability enables them to respond appropriately to different situations, such as differentiating between a sound that predicts a threatening event and one that does not.

Purpose of Stimulus Discrimination

An example of stimulus discrimination is Pavlov's dogs, which learned to discriminate between the basic tone that predicted food and other similar sounds, such as a doorbell, that did not predict food.

Pavlov's Dogs Stimulus Discrimination

An example of stimulus discrimination involves a cat named Tiger who learned to discriminate between the sound of a can opener, which predicted food, and the sound of an electric mixer, which did not.

Tiger the Cat Stimulus Discrimination

An example of stimulus discrimination in humans involves Moisha, a cancer patient who learned to discriminate between oncologists, which triggered a conditioned response of feeling ill, and other types of doctors she visited for routine appointments.

Moisha the Cancer Patient Stimulus Discrimination

An example of stimulus discrimination involves a cat named Tiger. If Tiger is not fed following an electric mixer sound, but is consistently fed after an electric can opener sound, she will quickly learn to discriminate between the two sounds, provided they are sufficiently dissimilar that she can tell them apart.

Stimulus Discrimination of Tiger the Cat

Stimulus discrimination is a learning process where an organism learns to respond differently to various similar stimuli. In the context of classical conditioning, this means the organism exhibits the conditioned response only to the specific conditioned stimulus, not to other stimuli that may be similar but do not signal the unconditioned stimulus. This ability to distinguish between predictive and non-predictive stimuli is crucial for appropriate responses, such as recognizing sounds that signal a threat versus those that do not.

Google

New York University

Michigan State University

Classical conditioning involves pairing one stimulus with a previously neutral stimulus, which causes a change in response to a neutral stimulus.

Classical Conditioning

Classical conditioning involves several key processes that describe how a conditioned response is learned and modified:

*   **Acquisition**: The initial stage of learning where a neutral stimulus is paired with an unconditioned stimulus to elicit a conditioned response.
*   **Extinction**: The gradual weakening and disappearance of a conditioned response when the conditioned stimulus is repeatedly presented without the unconditioned stimulus.
*   **Spontaneous Recovery**: The reappearance of an extinguished conditioned response after a period of rest.
*   **Stimulus Generalization**: The tendency for stimuli similar to the conditioned stimulus to elicit a similar conditioned response.
*   **Stimulus Discrimination**: The ability to differentiate between the conditioned stimulus and other stimuli that have not been paired with the unconditioned stimulus.

Key Processes in Classical Conditioning

- Camina, E., Güel, F. (2017). The Neuroanatomical, Neurophysiological and Psychological Basis of Memory: Current Models and Their Origins. Front. Pharmacol. 8:438. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00438

- Kreitzer, A. C. (2009). Physiology and pharmacology of striatal neurons. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 32, 127–147. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135422

- Spielman, R. M, et. al. (2020). Psychology 2e. OpenStax.

- Mackintosh, J. N. (1999). Classical and instrumental conditioning. Encyclopedia Britannica.

- McLeod, S. A. (2018, August 21). Classical conditioning. Simply Psychology. www.simplypsychology.org/classical-conditioning.html

References for implicit memory

Spielman, R. M., Jenkins, W. J., & Lovett, M. D. (2020, April 22). Psychology (2nd ed.). OpenStax. https://openstax.org/books/psychology-2e/pages/1-introduction

OpenStax Psychology (2nd ed.) Textbook

Habits form by repeating behaviors or actions after certain contextual cues. In repeating these actions, dependence on conscious motivation for performing the actions is reduced. The consistent repetition of actions over the period of 60+ days forms habits.

Formation of Habits

Stimulus generalization occurs when an organism elicits a conditioned response to stimuli that are similar, but not identical, to the original conditioned stimulus. This process is the opposite of stimulus discrimination. The likelihood of the conditioned response appearing is proportional to the similarity between the new stimulus and the conditioned stimulus; the more alike they are, the stronger the response.

Stimulus Generalization

Stimulus Discrimination

Higher-order conditioning, also known as second-order conditioning, occurs when an established conditioned stimulus is used to condition a new, neutral stimulus. In this process, the original conditioned stimulus effectively acts like an unconditioned stimulus for the new association. However, achieving conditioning beyond this second level is generally difficult, and the learned response is often weaker.

Higher-Order Conditioning (Second-Order Conditioning)

- Unconditioned stimulus (US): stimulus that produces an automatic response without prior conditioning


- Unconditioned response (UR): unconditioned reaction automatically elicited by the unconditioned stimulus


- Neutral stimulus (NS): a stimulus that elicits no response before conditioning


- Conditioned stimulus (CS): a previous NS that elicits a conditioned response after being paired with the US


- Conditioned response (CR): the learned response to the conditioned stimulus after the CS and US are paired


(Spielman 2020)

Classical Conditioning: Terms

The principles of classical conditioning are applied in various domains to understand and influence behavior. Key areas of application include explaining learned emotional responses like fear, developing therapies for anxiety disorders, and creating positive associations in advertising to promote products. It also provides a framework for understanding aspects of language acquisition, as explored in Relational Frame Theory (RFT).

Applications of Classical Conditioning

The Little Albert experiment, conducted by John Watson and Rosalie Rayner in 1920, is an influential case study in the history of psychology. The researchers repeatedly paired a loud noise with the approach of a white rat, which taught the young child to fear the rat along with other furry objects. This detailed observation of a single individual demonstrated how emotional responses could be conditioned.

The Little Albert Experiment

In classical conditioning, acquisition is the initial period of learning when an organism learns to connect a neutral stimulus and an unconditioned stimulus.

Acquisition in Classical Conditioning

Timing is crucial for classical conditioning to occur. Typically, there must be only a brief interval between the presentation of the conditioned stimulus and the unconditioned stimulus.

Timing in Classical Conditioning

Acquisition is the initial learning phase in classical conditioning where a neutral stimulus is repeatedly paired with an unconditioned stimulus. With each pairing, the strength of the conditioned response increases. This process of repeated association gradually transforms the neutral stimulus into a conditioned stimulus, which can then elicit the conditioned response on its own.

Acquisition

Extinction is the process in classical conditioning where a learned response diminishes and eventually vanishes. This occurs when the conditioned stimulus (CS) is repeatedly presented without the unconditioned stimulus (UCS). As the association between the two stimuli weakens, the organism's conditioned response (CR) becomes progressively weaker until it ceases entirely. For instance, Pavlov observed this when he repeatedly sounded a tone for his dogs without providing meat powder, which led to the dogs eventually stopping their salivation response to the tone.

Extinction

Spontaneous recovery is the re-emergence of a conditioned response that had previously been extinguished. This phenomenon occurs after a rest period during which the conditioned stimulus is not presented. For example, Pavlov observed that after his dogs underwent extinction training and stopped salivating to a bell, they would once again begin to salivate at the sound of the bell following a few hours of rest.

Spontaneous Recovery

The dynamic relationship between acquisition, extinction, and spontaneous recovery in classical conditioning can be visualized on a graph plotting the strength of the conditioned response (CR) against time. The graph shows distinct phases:
1.  **Acquisition:** During this phase, the conditioned stimulus (CS) is paired with the unconditioned stimulus (UCS). This results in a steep, upward-curving line, indicating a rapid increase in the strength of the CR.
2.  **Extinction:** When the CS is presented alone, the strength of the CR decreases sharply, shown as a downward-curving line that approaches zero.
3.  **Spontaneous Recovery:** After a rest period or pause, the CR can reappear when the CS is presented again. This is shown as a sudden jump in the CR's strength, although typically not to the peak level seen during acquisition. The response will then undergo extinction again if the UCS is not reintroduced.

Graphical Representation of Classical Conditioning Processes

A person's daily encounters with an ice cream truck can illustrate the key processes of classical conditioning. Initially, the truck's music is a neutral stimulus, while the taste of ice cream is an unconditioned stimulus that naturally causes the mouth to water (unconditioned response).
1.  **Acquisition:** After repeatedly hearing the music just before eating ice cream, the person learns the association, and their mouth begins to water (conditioned response) at the sound of the music alone (now a conditioned stimulus).
2.  **Extinction:** If the person then hears the music for several days but is unable to get ice cream, the conditioned response of salivating weakens and eventually stops.
3.  **Spontaneous Recovery:** Following a weekend break with no exposure to the truck, hearing the music again can cause the salivation response to reappear.

Example of Classical Conditioning Processes: The Ice Cream Truck

Based on the scenario, which specific learning process is demonstrated by the dog's eventual ability to distinguish between the sound of the owner's specific car and other cars? Explain your reasoning.

Learn Before

Related

Learn After