Concept
Results of the Spacing vs. Cramming and LMS engagement study
- Students who maintained spacing had higher grades overall than students who maintained cramming
- Self-reported study patterns based on the survey are pretty accurate predictors for final course outcomes
- Self-reported spacers engaged more with the resources than the students who were self-reported crammers
- Daily resource click counts were averaged and show that students who maintained cramming interacted less than those who maintained spacing
- Overall, students interacted more with the LMS closer to exam dates than other lower-stakes assignments-exam dates were driving the students towards interaction
- Spacing and cramming students illustrated similar patterns of cramming before exams, indicating that instructors need to encourage students to space more
- There was inconclusive results about URM students and their study habits

0
1
Updated 2021-02-03
Tags
Psychology
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Related
Spacing vs. Cramming and LMS engagement study Intro
Purpose of the Spacing vs. Cramming and LMS engagement study
Study Setting/participants of the Spacing vs. Cramming and LMS engagement study
Data used for the Spacing vs. Cramming and LMS engagement study
Survey Measure for the Spacing vs. Cramming and LMS engagement study
Results of the Spacing vs. Cramming and LMS engagement study